thanks, that are a really powerfully advantages for booting from SAN.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hmmm...
AMD contributed the graphics driver for it to X.Org and
continues to maintain it there, but we've never shipped
it in Solaris/OpenSolaris. I don't know of any reason
it would take more than 10 minutes to just drop into our
trees and build though.
Aren't those things being sold in th
If system crashes some time after last commit of transaction group (TxG), what
happens to the file system transactions since the last commit of TxG
(I presume last commit of TxG represents the last on-disk consistency)?
Does ZFS recover all file system transactions which it returned with success
si
Jazz Geek wrote:
> HI All, I have a problem in that my application needs to write things to the
> /usr/lib/* directories. However, on the Zone, it's READ ONLY.
>
> Is there anyway I can make the /usr/lib/* a normal rwx directory?
>
>
Create a whole root zone.
Ian
HI All, I have a problem in that my application needs to write things to the
/usr/lib/* directories. However, on the Zone, it's READ ONLY.
Is there anyway I can make the /usr/lib/* a normal rwx directory?
Thank you for your help.
SB
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 04/05/07, Thomas Rampelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dick Davies wrote:
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b63/on-changelog-b63.html
That works! Is there a link to that somewhere or is this an insider's tip?
I just change the 2 embedded numbers every fortnight and there it is :)
I d
> Is 112.2o7.net aka 2o7.net and Omniture necessary for
> a good Opensolaris website
> experience? I often find that sinking the site into
> a black hole speeds things up and
> even causes downloads to function.
>
Correction I should have said: sunopensolaris.112.207.net
Than again 2o7.net
RTL8110SC/RTL8169SC
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Gw3Zx
X-OpenSolaris-URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=116341&tstart=0#116341
> Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> >
> >
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
This makes sense and I've had similar experiences myself. I guess the
reason I suggested it is there has been, historically, a
formal/scalable way to raise the profile on bugs affecting Solaris
that is not always well understood by people outside Sun.
email definitely
Tom Haynes wrote:
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
While it's possible to go ping the engineer and that's valuable for
Dennis, it does nothing to raise the profile of the bug to Solaris
engineering, does it? How should a community member raise the
profile of a bug affecting them? email the engineer?
Is 112.2o7.net aka 2o7.net and Omniture necessary for a good Opensolaris website
experience? I often find that sinking the site into a black hole speeds
things up and
even causes downloads to function.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> You can run into geometry issues.
That's what I thought too. But mirroring works, at least with SVM, so long as
both disks are the same capacity. They do not have to be the same geometry.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-di
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
While it's possible to go ping the engineer and that's valuable for
Dennis, it does nothing to raise the profile of the bug to Solaris
engineering, does it? How should a community member raise the profile
of a bug affecting them? email the engineer? email
opensolari
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Re : bug_id=6497363
How do I reach the engineer with this bug on his desk ?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6497363
Get the engineer's name from there and send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
Just having a look at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developers_program
Anyone thinking of porting OpenSolaris to this? Would be a pretty fun project
for a bunch of people I think? [1].
As this is running on a Geode CPU (whic
On 5/4/07, Thomas Rampelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dick Davies wrote:
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b63/on-changelog-b63.html
>
What should I be looking for here? I see no update to rge driver nor
reference to a RealTek driver.
Dennis
Dick Davies wrote:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b63/on-changelog-b63.html
?
That works! Is there a link to that somewhere or is this an insider's tip?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Javier O. Augusto wrote:
[..]
Given how long XVR-2500 took, I would be surprised if it's that soon,
and have no idea the feature set the SPARC team plans on including.
Alan, I'm making it simple...
What's the plan for SPARC (if there's any... =/ )
I thought I'd made it fairly clear in the pr
On 5/4/07, Tom Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Well in that case "you're welcome" is the correct response here
> because I got there first and hit this wall and bashed my brains out
> on trying to get that RTL8110SC based ethernet to work with the
> available drivers.
>
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Well in that case "you're welcome" is the correct response here
because I got there first and hit this wall and bashed my brains out
on trying to get that RTL8110SC based ethernet to work with the
available drivers.
So if you were thanking me for blowing the time energy and
The holy grails of SAN boot:
1) Can use array based replication
2) Can snap volumes for backup
3) Can clone volumes to incredibly speed up system provisioning. (Make
a master root disk image and just copy it for new systems.) Or if you
are really sneaky, and your array supports it you can make co
about the USP I don't know.
AMS-500 work realy fine.
Oh it works alright, it's just that Sun won't stand behind it as a
supported configuration.
-Brian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
about the USP I don't know.
AMS-500 work realy fine.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
most of our servers have login shells for our users.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 5/4/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ifconfig -a
> gani1:
> flags=1000842 mtu
> 1500 index 1
> inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
> ether 0:30:18:b0:29:b7
> G: gani1: gani_mii_read: timeout
> WARNING: gani0: gani_mii_read: timeout
>
> # ifconfig gani1 172.31.254.252 netmask
> 255.255.
[..]
> Given how long XVR-2500 took, I would be surprised if it's that soon,
> and have no idea the feature set the SPARC team plans on including.
>
Alan, I'm making it simple...
What's the plan for SPARC (if there's any... =/ )
I still got SPARC hardware running and I'd regret to drop'em for some
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just having a look at
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developers_program
>
> Anyone thinking of porting OpenSolaris to this? Would be a pretty fun project
> for a bunch of people I think? [1].
As this is running on a Geode CPU (which is x86 compa
> # ifconfig -a
> gani1:
> flags=1000842 mtu
> 1500 index 1
> inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
> ether 0:30:18:b0:29:b7
> G: gani1: gani_mii_read: timeout
> WARNING: gani0: gani_mii_read: timeout
>
> # ifconfig gani1 172.31.254.252 netmask
> 255.255.255.248
> # ifconfig gani1 up
> # ping 172.31.254.
> What is the recommendation for doing boot from SAN?
> I have /,/var,swap partitions, with of them is
> recommended to put on the SAN for sure?
I would only have two slices, "/" and swap for file systems. Users don't really
get shell accounts these days, so the argument of users filling up the /
We have the USP, from HDS. Because Sun also sells a rebadged USP, they
didn't certify the competing product.
On 5/4/07, shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what?
Sun certify this AMS storage as a boot from SAN, and also with MPxIO.
I did it, and It work perfect.
This message posted from opensolari
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Re : bug_id=6497363
How do I reach the engineer with this bug on his desk ?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6497363
Get the engineer's name from there and send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another scalable, more
what?
Sun certify this AMS storage as a boot from SAN, and also with MPxIO.
I did it, and It work perfect.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 5/3/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So
Given the difficulties of incorporating the swt libraries needed
to make Azureus work on Solaris, what other BitTorrent client should
Solaris incorporate?
- Bart
what about the official client? solaris
33 matches
Mail list logo
