Re: [osol-discuss] installing zones

2007-07-12 Thread Lu, Baolu
/home in OpenSolaris is not a good directory to place the zone root file system. bash-3.00# ls -ld /home dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 1 Jul 7 16:47 /home -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oscar Sent: 2007年7月13日 2:16 To: opensola

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote: >>> Dennis Clarke wrote: >>> This seems to be an opportunity to employ some code early in the boot phase and to perhaps print out some debugging info at that time. The question is .. where and what to debug. >>> Can you send me the output o

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Eric Saxe
Dennis Clarke wrote: >> Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >>> This seems to be an opportunity to employ some code early in the boot >>> phase >>> and to perhaps print out some debugging info at that time. >>> >>> The question is .. where and what to debug. >>> >>> >> Can you send me the output of

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote: >> This seems to be an opportunity to employ some code early in the boot >> phase >> and to perhaps print out some debugging info at that time. >> >> The question is .. where and what to debug. >> > Can you send me the output of: > > # echo "cpuid_info0::print" | mdb -k # e

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Eric Saxe
Dennis Clarke wrote: > This seems to be an opportunity to employ some code early in the boot phase > and to perhaps print out some debugging info at that time. > > The question is .. where and what to debug. > Can you send me the output of: # echo "cpuid_info0::print" | mdb -k Those are the te

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote: >>> Jürgen Keil wrote: > cpu0: x86 (CentaurHauls 6A9 family 6 model 10 step 9 clock 1200 MHz) > cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1200MHz > Could be missing / broken or incomplete VIA/CentaurHauls x86 cpu support: >>> I'm suspecting that you are correct J

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Stephen Lau
Dennis Clarke wrote: >> Jürgen Keil wrote: cpu0: x86 (CentaurHauls 6A9 family 6 model 10 step 9 clock 1200 MHz) cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1200MHz >>> Could be missing / broken or incomplete VIA/CentaurHauls x86 cpu support: >>> >> I'm suspecting that you are correct Jürgen. Accordin

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Jürgen Keil wrote: >> >>> cpu0: x86 (CentaurHauls 6A9 family 6 model 10 step 9 clock 1200 MHz) >>> cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1200MHz >>> >> >> Could be missing / broken or incomplete VIA/CentaurHauls x86 cpu support: >> > I'm suspecting that you are correct Jürgen. According to: > http://en

Re: [osol-discuss] panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1f2e0: assertion failed

2007-07-12 Thread Eric Saxe
Jürgen Keil wrote: > >> cpu0: x86 (CentaurHauls 6A9 family 6 model 10 step 9 clock 1200 MHz) >> cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1200MHz >> > > Could be missing / broken or incomplete VIA/CentaurHauls x86 cpu support: > I'm suspecting that you are correct Jürgen. According to: http://en.wi

Re: [osol-discuss] installing zones

2007-07-12 Thread UNIX admin
> zonepath: /home/zones One may not use /home for anything other than the AutoMounter facility, especially under Solaris. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] installing zones

2007-07-12 Thread Oscar
bash-3.00# zoneadm -z myzones install Preparing to install zone . Checking file system on device to be mounted at ERROR: file system check of failed:d ERROR: cannot setup zone inherited and configured file systems ERROR: cannot setup zone file systems inherited and configured from te ERROR:

Re: [osol-discuss] Project proposal: Common Multiprotocol SCSI Target

2007-07-12 Thread John Forte
The fact that it is posted here is partially my fault. When I last checked on 5/30, I was informed that the new policy was not yet active. For others' benefit, this is the announcement: I missed: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=32850&tstart=15 This message posted from o

Re: [osol-discuss] High system cpu time

2007-07-12 Thread Gino
Hi Sherry, here you are: Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace cpu.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci ufs ip hook neti sctp arp usba qlc fctl nca lofs zfs random fcp sppp md cpc fcip crypto logindmux ptm ipc nfs ] > ::cpuinfo ID ADDR FLG NRUN BSPL PRI RNRN KRNRN SWITCH

Re: [osol-discuss] High system cpu time

2007-07-12 Thread Sherry Moore
Hi Gino, Could you login as root, and run # mdb -k At mdb prompt, type > ::cpuinfo One of the CPUs is probably running sched. Use the value under heading "THREAD" for the CPU, and do > put-your-thread-value-here::findstack -v For example, > fffed378a760::findstack -v Ple

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] About CDE removing (In which Build?)

2007-07-12 Thread Calum Benson
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 10:57 -0700, Rich Teer wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > > There is no schedule yet - at the moment individual pieces are starting > > to be removed (sdtimage is out already, sdtaudiocontrol will probably > > come out around the time OSS goes in), but

[osol-discuss] High system cpu time

2007-07-12 Thread Gino
Hi All, snv67, 4xOpteron. We have some performance problems on this server. In particular mpstat is reporting CPU#1 at 93% sys. Is there a way to find out what that cpu is doing? svr11@/test# lockstat -kIW -D 20 sleep 30 Profiling interrupt: 11648 events in 30.026 seconds (388 events/sec) Cou

Re: [osol-discuss] nv b67 oddities

2007-07-12 Thread James Carlson
Thomas Maier-Komor writes: > James Carlson schrieb: > > Thomas Maier-Komor writes: > >> I am wondering if it is normal that pkginfo bails out with a dynamic > >> linker error stating that libssl.so.0.9.7 is missing on a nevada build 67 > >> (SPARC). > > > > No. That sounds like a broken system.

Re: [osol-discuss] Flash Player 9 for solaris is released to the public.

2007-07-12 Thread Andrew Watkins
Don't make the same mistake as me and install Flash on a Solaris 9 box. OK! It does say Solaris 10, but I thought it may work. Andrew This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.o

Re: [osol-discuss] vim + cscope

2007-07-12 Thread Aubrey Li
On 7/12/07, Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/12/07 05:38, Aubrey Li wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > Does anyone have successful experience about vim + cscope to browse > > solaris source code? > > Unfortunate, I encountered the following error, > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [osol-discuss] FlashPlayer 9 on SXDE on Laptop...It's Been a Long Time Coming!

2007-07-12 Thread Mark Phalan
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:17 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: > > Does about:config only list flash 9,0,47.0? > > > > Casper > > > > Did a "flash" filter on aboutLconfig nothing of pertinence came out. > Casper probably meant "about:plugins". -M ___ o

Re: [osol-discuss] vim + cscope

2007-07-12 Thread Gavin Maltby
Hi, On 07/12/07 05:38, Aubrey Li wrote: > Hi list, > > Does anyone have successful experience about vim + cscope to browse > solaris source code? > Unfortunate, I encountered the following error, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > /export/home/aubrey/work/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

[osol-discuss] Zfs Sata array?

2007-07-12 Thread Giles Turner
On 7/12/07, Completely Illogical <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > B, > > Thanks for the thoughts. I think individual USB enclosures would be double > power consumption, a serious consideration when doing 12 drives! USB?!?! That really came out of the blue. I was thinking of things like SOHOTank enclo