> If Sun management has decided it wants to move from the democratic
> model of open source project to the benevolent dictator model, it
> needs to come out and say so.
Bold and underline this one, baby!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
o
Hello,
I downloaded SXCE V76 DVD files (3), when I try to uncompress the files I
receive an error. Md5sum check isn't correct.
I tried with the CDs too (6), first one has the same problem.
Regards, Feranndo.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only two Solaris file systems that are endian-neutral are ISO
> 9660 (High Sierra), which is read-only, and of course ZFS.
The "endian-neutrality" of ISO-9660 is a joke!
As the data in question is not properly aligned in the on-dosk structures,
there
Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I just setup a new NIS server on NV.
>
> Then I pasted all the passwd and shadow entries from one of the local
> linux boxes on the end of yp source files.
>
> It just hit me though. The linux box was storing the encrypted passwords
> in a newer format (I bel
Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only two Solaris file systems that are endian-neutral are ISO
> 9660 (High Sierra), which is read-only, and of course ZFS.
Personally I wouldn't say that ZFS isn endian-neutral but endian aware
(or adaptive). Writes are done in the local endianness bu
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only two Solaris file systems that are endian-neutral are ISO
> > 9660 (High Sierra), which is read-only, and of course ZFS.
>
> Personally I wouldn't say that ZFS isn endian-neutral but endian aware
> (o
Robert Mazur wrote:
> SHORT: Where is a OpenSolaris newbie to go? Is SX*E a dead-end and should I
> not bother using anything here at the moment?
SX*E is not a dead end, although we can expect SXDE to be replaced by
Project Indiana at some stage.
> EXPLANATION: I am a use of Solaris since
There is a program, once called BrandZ for Linux that allows you to run Linux
programs on Solaris kernel. However the Linux kernel must be v2.4 you can use
CentOS4 or Redhat4(?). There is some experimental support for linux v2.6
kernel, but that is not really supported.
I have installed linux d
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Kyle McDonald wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I just setup a new NIS server on NV.
>>
>> Then I pasted all the passwd and shadow entries from one of the local
>> linux boxes on the end of yp source files.
>>
>> It just hit me though. The linux box was storing the encrypted
>> pas
Did you use the Sun Download Manager?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
W. Wayne Liauh writes:
> Sun owns the trademark "Open Solaris". I don't know how things were
> arranged, however, it is reasonable to assume that the
> OpenSolaris.org must have acquired a license, either explicitly or
> by implication, to use the mark Open Solaris or OpenSolaris.
Indeed, a lack
I downloaded using both ways, SDM and directly.
Regards, Fernando.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Kyle McDonald wrote:
> If possible, I'd like someone to confirm what I think I've proved by my
> experiments:
>
> 1. The default Solaris config will compare the password entered with the
> encrypted version in the shadow file using what ever crypt method *the
> existing password* was encrypted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If someone changes their password and they are using a deprecated algrithm
> their new password will be encoded with the default.
>
>
Ahh.
That's what I missed.
I (for some reason) thought if I depracated an algorithm, all accounts
using that algorithm would be unab
Congratulations, b76 has solved this problem.
No error message shown now. Great.
Regards
Roman
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>1. The default Solaris config will compare the password entered with the
>encrypted version in the shadow file using what ever crypt method *the
>existing password* was encrypted with?
Yes, the existing encryption is encoded in the hash and that encryption
is used, obviously, to compute the ha
> Hello,
> I downloaded SXCE V76 DVD files (3), when I try to
> uncompress the files I receive an error. Md5sum check
> isn't correct.
> I tried with the CDs too (6), first one has the same
> problem.
> Regards, Feranndo.
I downloaded the three SXCE76 DVD files last night and the following are the
Thank you for your detailed response! More in-line responses from me below.
> When you installed, did you explicitly choose
> Developer Edition? I
> think that you can choose between Developer Edition
> and Community
> Edition on the same image. If you don't have
> NetBeans, or SunStudio
> (
I just wanted to put in another positive vote for the SDM. I makes the
downloading procedure more predictable and a clean process.
Rob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 11/6/07, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Putting /usr/gnu at the head of PATH causes incompatibilities to
> > apply.
>
> Failure to put /usr/gnu at the head of PATH will cause a huge class
> of potential Solaris users to be confused
Hi All,
Any idea if we have a project to implement setkeycodes in Indiana ?
This is a show stopper for my OEM customers thinking about putting
Indiana on laptops.
The gnome-keybinding-properties application from gnome control center
is basically useless in Indiana.
In Ubuntu and Fedora the
> I believe you've greatly mischaracterized the effort
> of the people
> involved, and I request that you take a few moments
> to familiarize
> yourself with the discussion that has occurred on
> ogb-discuss, and the
> summary of yesterday's board meeting.
>
> --
> James Carlson, Solaris Networki
I downloaded DVD parts with SDM yesterday and all md5sums are according to the
listing.
The final ISO is working too.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Nov 8, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Josh Leckner wrote:
> What I want to be able to see is that both HBA's report active and
> online with (1) channel off of each HBA, while the other channel on
> the same HBA is the standby mode. I also want to keep failover
> enabled as well. Or is there a way t
i have a core2 duo intel laptop running indiana and after seeing messages like:
Nov 8 20:23:43 saturn cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power of 1833 MHz
in dmesg, i was wondering if there is a way to force the processor to
run at a lower frequen
> Hi All,
> Any idea if we have a project to implement setkeycodes in Indiana ?
> This is a show stopper for my OEM customers thinking about putting Indiana on
> laptops.
> The gnome-keybinding-properties application from gnome control center is
> basically useless in
> Indiana.
> In Ubuntu
> I've always wondered why Solaris doesn't give you a
> GUI option to reboot the system, even for root. It
> seems like such an obvious thing to have, I can't
> believe it hasn't been added already. Why is it
> missing?
We're so new to the reboot stuff...
This message posted from opensolaris.o
Hi,
I recently read that the option for compression on loopback devices was
put back recently.
This is good news.
Where to look for more info? like:
What compression types are supported?
I'm specifically hoping to use it on compressed .iso files. In the PC
world there are several utilities th
okhow?
I have configured a sparc box running Solaris 10 u4 with (2) Qlogic 2460 HBA's,
each with a single channel to a seperate switch, and then (2) channels from the
switch to a Sun 6540 Array. This shows up with (4) channels, (2) per HBA, to
the drives on the array.
I have used the stms
>I've always wondered why Solaris doesn't give you a GUI option to
>reboot the system, even for root. It seems like such an obvious thing to
>have, I can't believe it hasn't been added already. Why is
>it missing?
Because you shouldn't reboot all that often?
Casper
__
I've always wondered why Solaris doesn't give you a GUI option to reboot the
system, even for root. It seems like such an obvious thing to have, I can't
believe it hasn't been added already. Why is it missing?
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
A quick google search reveals that wireless card uses the RaLink 2573 chipset.
Support for the 2500 chip was recently integrated into Solaris Nevada. The
device support list at http://ralink.rapla.net/ says that the Linksys WUSB54G
v4 and WUSB54GP v4 are supported, but I don't know enough about
Neither the Sun Java web server version nor the Apache version of RSA's web
agent client (5.3) seems to work under Solaris 10 08/07. Both versions 5.2 and
5.3 of the Sun Java web server RSA webagent work on a pre-08/07 kernel, however.
Under 08/07, both agents work from the command line (acetes
Everyone:
The below steps that David provides aren't exactly right if you are
using Nevada. Note that on Solaris 10 the GDM configuration
file is /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf, but on Solaris Nevada there are two
configuration files. The default values are in
/usr/share/gdm/defaults.conf and you can ov
Shawn Walker wrote:
> The only remedy available, in the author's view, is to ensure that
> four changes are made by amending our constitution:
>
> 1) The OGB is empowered to make more decisions for the community.
>
I believe that the OGB has almost unlimited powers. That is to say,
there is li
On 08/11/2007, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > The only remedy available, in the author's view, is to ensure that
> > four changes are made by amending our constitution:
> >
> > 1) The OGB is empowered to make more decisions for the community.
> >
> I believe that
On 11/8/07, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe you've greatly mischaracterized the effort
> > of the people
> > involved, and I request that you take a few moments
> > to familiarize
> > yourself with the discussion that has occurred on
> > ogb-discuss, and the
> > summary of y
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I agree, a singular leader would be important. I have come to believe
> that the following are the requirements:
>
> 1) They must have non-Sun, non-Solaris F/OSS experience
> 2) They must have some understanding of Sun and Solaris history and
> practices
> 3) They must be
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>> I agree, a singular leader would be important. I have come to
>> believe that the following are the requirements:
>>
>> 1) They must have non-Sun, non-Solaris F/OSS experience
>> 2) They must have some understanding of Sun and Solaris history and
>
Really? As far as I know, we have not made any change about the battery
status applet in nevada.
Regards,
Jedy
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:41 -0800, Roman Morokutti wrote:
> Congratulations, b76 has solved this problem.
> No error message shown now. Great.
>
> Regards
> Roman
>
>
> This message
I'd like to separate some things here: The OGB is an
elected body by
the
Members and it runs nothing. It sets policy and
enforces policy. The
Facilitators run the community from a management
perspective
(potentially, anyway). There are, what, 150 or so
Members and 40 or so
Facilitators. The Me
41 matches
Mail list logo
