Hi All,
Thanks a lot for the responses. I used libumem to find out where the
error occurred. But after I set the variables LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG,
I found that sometimes the SIGSEGV was gone
But this process runs on two machines simultaneously and these two
machines communicate about
HI,
I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I downloaded
one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough, and I want to
use the opensolaris, it seems close to debian, with gnome
and Finally.
Once network team opened port 6000, boom! I could see the X Display working
properly Now one of the machines where I had set up gnome as the default
display manager, it shows that desktop whereas on the other one, where dtlogin
is running in maintenance mode, it shows
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I bet that since you're coming from a Linux background, you're coming
to Solaris with a understanding that what's in Linux is what's been
Universally True since the dawn of *NIX. However, this isn't as Linux
distros as we know them today have been around for only
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6)
libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6)
libumem.so.1`umem_do_abort+0x25(9, fefb5000, 804691c, fef98b1c,
fefa3ae8, 80aa810)
libumem.so.1`umem_err_recoverable+0x46(fefa3ae8)
Xizhi Zhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, guys,
When I build NS2.30 all in one in my OpenSolaris, it encounters an error that
the compiler use the strchr function with the return value of const char *
not the char *, which is what I needed.
Do you try to compile C code using a C++ Compiler?
Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that may help is to prepend /usr/ucb to yout $PATH before
/usr/bin. This will bring the Berkley UNIX flavor of many commands to
the forefront. I think this will help because all the UNIX variants you
list above (except Linux which isn't
Hi
This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process
running.
Status: ready and active
Concurrency:0
Logs: (inactive)
Message buffer:
umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer
buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6)
libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6)
libumem.so.1`umem_do_abort+0x25(9, fefb5000, 804691c, fef98b1c,
fefa3ae8, 80aa810)
libumem.so.1`umem_err_recoverable+0x46(fefa3ae8)
Hi
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
And I reiterate that things worked fine some times with the 32 bit
binary also
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
This is libumem catching a memory error (either a double free or a heap
overrun). On this coredump, what'S the output of ::umem_status when you
load
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi,
From the umem_status I too agree that some thing in my program corrupted
the memory. I am working on as to what caused the problem. The same
program works fine always in SPARC platform. Why is it that it is
causing problems on x86 architecture
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
It is fairly certain that the bug is in your program.
Memory corruption bugs are hard to trace and are not always easy to
reproduce. A
This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process
running.
Status: ready and active
Concurrency:0
Logs: (inactive)
Message buffer:
umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer
buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80
This
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
And I reiterate that things worked fine some times with the 32 bit
binary also
I'd
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that may help is to prepend /usr/ucb to yout $PATH before
/usr/bin. This will bring the Berkley UNIX flavor of many commands to
the forefront. I think this will help because all the UNIX variants you
list above
HI,
I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough,
and I want to use the opensolaris, it seems close to debian, with gnome
I think bge(7d) include most broadcom GBE.
If a bge NIC is not detected automatically, try:
a) prtconf -v # to show the device's (pciID, sunclass)
e.g. i have a bge of pci173b,3ea
b) edit /etc/driver_aliases to be aware of of the entry
in my case, add 'bge pci173b,3ea'
c) reboot
d) the
MC wrote:
have you disabled samba?
svcadm disable samba
I did that and it didn't make a difference.
I'm sorry I didn't give you the full error text, I just figured I had run
into something obvious.
The full error:
# svcadm disable samba
# svcadm enable -r smb/server
svcadm:
Since b78 has delayed for more than three weeks, I was hoping that b79 could
come out before the holidays began. Looks like this hope is dashed.
Anyway, Happy New Year and a late Mele Kalikimaka!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Dennis,
I must remember not to ask you the time. ; )
Nice response.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dennis,
I must remember not to ask you the time. ; )
Well it was Christas time after all. I felt the urge to just write
something that was at least useful ya know?
Nice response.
You don't think it was too much ? :-)
-
Dennis Clarke
___
Hi Dennis,
Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this list a continuing effort?
Thanks again.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Dennis,
Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this
list a continuing
effort? Thanks again.
ya lost me :-\
What list ?
Dennis
A list (in a futuristic sense) b/t how you do things in Linux vis-a-vis in
Solaris, especially for the mundane things, things that
On Dec 26, 2007 3:58 AM, A.Belahcene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough, and
I
waynel, try http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
dennis, no, not too much. I just loved the detail.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Brian Utterback wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something
that
has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
there
is a problem in the way Sun is organized if
Hi Dennis,
Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this
list a continuing
effort? Thanks again.
ya lost me :-\
What list ?
Dennis
A list (in a futuristic sense) b/t how you do things in Linux vis-a-vis in
Solaris, especially for the mundane things, things that are
waynel, try http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
dennis, no, not too much. I just loved the detail.
Oh .. thanks. I guess I have been slacking off on some documentation issues
lately and I need to pull up my bootstraps. The problem is that regular work
and contract stuff gets in the way and I do
Next year ASUS will increase the screen size of EeePCs from 7 to 8.9:
http://tech.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/Inc/2007cti-news-Tech-inc/Tech-Content/0,4703,12050901%20122007122600132,00.html
Currently the EeePCs have a screen resolution of only 640 x 480 (although it
will increase to
Jason King wrote:
On Dec 26, 2007 3:58 AM, A.Belahcene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete
Hey all,
I tried the following combinations, of IPMP and Link Aggregation ( Nemo stuff )
.
With Cisco and Dlink managed Switches.
Some of these switches has facilities to arrgegate ports ( port aggregation )
on the switch, i used them, for no use.. Only one active port is selected at
Hi
I have tried LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG with my program on Sparc.
Everything worked. I also am unable to find any bug in my program.
No clue as to who is the culprit..
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26,
Dear All,
Im working on to study the following security library but finding any document
or reference.
Can any one will provide link of the document which explain about the following
libsec libsecdb,libbsm,libcontract in detail.
Thanks in advance
singh
This message posted from
34 matches
Mail list logo
