Dear All,
Im working on to study the following security library but finding any document
or reference.
Can any one will provide link of the document which explain about the following
libsec libsecdb,libbsm,libcontract in detail.
Thanks in advance
singh
This message posted from opensolari
Hi
I have tried LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG with my program on Sparc.
Everything worked. I also am unable to find any bug in my program.
No clue as to who is the culprit..
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 200
Hey all,
I tried the following combinations, of IPMP and Link Aggregation ( Nemo stuff )
.
With Cisco and Dlink managed Switches.
Some of these switches has facilities to arrgegate ports ( port aggregation )
on the switch, i used them, for no use.. Only one active port is selected at
particul
Jason King wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007 3:58 AM, A.Belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> HI,
>> I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
>> equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
>> downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but no
Next year ASUS will increase the screen size of EeePCs from 7" to 8.9":
http://tech.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/Inc/2007cti-news-Tech-inc/Tech-Content/0,4703,12050901%20122007122600132,00.html
Currently the EeePCs have a screen resolution of only 640 x 480 (although it
will increase to 8
> waynel, try http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
>
> dennis, no, not too much. I just loved the detail.
>
Oh .. thanks. I guess I have been slacking off on some documentation issues
lately and I need to pull up my bootstraps. The problem is that regular work
and contract stuff gets in the way and I do
>>
>> > Hi Dennis,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this
>> "list" a continuing
>> > effort? Thanks again.
>>
>> ya lost me :-\
>>
>> What list ?
>>
>> Dennis
>
> A "list" (in a futuristic sense) b/t how you do things in Linux vis-a-vis in
> Solaris, especially for th
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Brian Utterback wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something
>>> that
>>> has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
>>> there
>>> is a problem in the way
waynel, try http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
dennis, no, not too much. I just loved the detail.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 26, 2007 3:58 AM, A.Belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI,
> I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
> equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
> downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough, and
>
> > Hi Dennis,
> >
> > Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this
> "list" a continuing
> > effort? Thanks again.
>
> ya lost me :-\
>
> What list ?
>
> Dennis
A "list" (in a futuristic sense) b/t how you do things in Linux vis-a-vis in
Solaris, especially for the mundane thi
> Hi Dennis,
>
> Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this "list" a continuing
> effort? Thanks again.
ya lost me :-\
What list ?
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Dennis,
Thanks for the info. Is there any way to make this "list" a continuing effort?
Thanks again.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Dennis,
>
> I must remember not to ask you the time. ; )
Well it was Christas time after all. I felt the urge to just write
something that was at least useful ya know?
> Nice response.
You don't think it was too much ? :-)
-
Dennis Clarke
___
Dennis,
I must remember not to ask you the time. ; )
Nice response.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Since b78 has delayed for more than three weeks, I was hoping that b79 could
come out before the holidays began. Looks like this hope is dashed.
Anyway, Happy New Year and a late Mele Kalikimaka!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensol
MC wrote:
>> have you disabled samba?
>>
>> svcadm disable samba
>>
>
> I did that and it didn't make a difference.
>
> I'm sorry I didn't give you the full error text, I just figured I had run
> into something obvious.
>
> The full error:
>
> # svcadm disable samba
> # svcadm enable -r smb
I think bge(7d) include most broadcom GBE.
If a bge NIC is not detected automatically, try:
a) prtconf -v # to show the device's (pciID, sunclass)
e.g. i have a bge of pci173b,3ea
b) edit /etc/driver_aliases to be aware of of the entry
in my case, add 'bge "pci173b,3ea"'
c) reboot
d) the
> HI,
> I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
> equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I
> downloaded one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough,
> and I want to use the opensolaris, it seems close to debian, with gn
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> One thing that may help is to prepend /usr/ucb to yout $PATH before
>> /usr/bin. This will bring the Berkley UNIX flavor of many commands to
>> the forefront. I think this will help because all the UNIX variants you
>> l
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> From the umem_status I too agree that some thing in my program corrupted
> the memory. I am working on as to what caused the problem. The same
> program works fine always in "SPARC" platform. Why is it that it is
> causing problems on x86 archi
Hi,
>From the umem_status I too agree that some thing in my program corrupted
the memory. I am working on as to what caused the problem. The same
program works fine always in "SPARC" platform. Why is it that it is
causing problems on x86 architecture only?
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
>This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process
>running.
>
>Status: ready and active
>Concurrency:0
>Logs: (inactive)
>Message buffer:
>umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer
>buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Hi
>
> I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
> with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
> while compling?
> And I reiterate that things worked fine some times with the 32 bit
> binary also...
>I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
>with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
>while compling?
It is fairly certain that the bug is in your program.
Memory corruption bugs are hard to trace and are not always easy to
reproduce. A
Hi
This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process
running.
Status: ready and active
Concurrency:0
Logs: (inactive)
Message buffer:
umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer
buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80
previo
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Hi
> Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
> following stack trace
This is libumem catching a memory error (either a double free or a heap
overrun). On this coredump, what'S the output of "::umem_status" when you
lo
Hi
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
And I reiterate that things worked fine some times with the 32 bit
binary also
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing that may help is to prepend /usr/ucb to yout $PATH before
> /usr/bin. This will bring the Berkley UNIX flavor of many commands to
> the forefront. I think this will help because all the UNIX variants you
> list above (except Linux which isn't
>Hi
>Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
>following stack trace
>
>libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6)
>libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6)
>libumem.so.1`umem_do_abort+0x25(9, fefb5000, 804691c, fef98b1c,
>fefa3ae8, 80aa810)
>libumem.so.1`umem_err_recoverable+0x46(fefa3ae8)
>l
Xizhi Zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> When I build NS2.30 all in one in my OpenSolaris, it encounters an error that
> the compiler use the strchr function with the return value of "const char *"
> not the "char *", which is what I needed.
Do you try to compile C code using a C++
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6)
libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6)
libumem.so.1`umem_do_abort+0x25(9, fefb5000, 804691c, fef98b1c,
fefa3ae8, 80aa810)
libumem.so.1`umem_err_recoverable+0x46(fefa3ae8)
libumem.so.1
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> I bet that since you're coming from a Linux background, you're coming
>> to Solaris with a understanding that what's in Linux is what's been
>> Universally True since the dawn of *NIX. However, this isn't as Linux
>> distros as we know them today have been around for
HI,
I am new to solaris, but my knowleges on linux ( debian ) is good, i need
equivalent for some linux commands. ( a summarize doc is welcome, I downloaded
one: Linux to Solaris from treklogic, but not complete enough, and I want to
use the opensolaris, it seems close to debian, with gnome des
and Finally.
Once network team opened port 6000, boom! I could see the X Display working
properly Now one of the machines where I had set up gnome as the default
display manager, it shows that desktop whereas on the other one, where dtlogin
is running in maintenance mode, it shows cde1.
Hi, guys,
When I build NS2.30 all in one in my OpenSolaris, it encounters an error that
the compiler use the strchr function with the return value of "const char *"
not the "char *", which is what I needed.
But when I use the "man strchr", there are both of the functions in the
mannual. But bo
Hi All,
Thanks a lot for the responses. I used libumem to find out where the
error occurred. But after I set the variables LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG,
I found that sometimes the SIGSEGV was gone
But this process runs on two machines simultaneously and these two
machines communicate about t
37 matches
Mail list logo
