http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/AzureusForSolarisX86
Azureus Wiki = win.
I downloaded the 2.5 version from there I believe, just stuck it in
/opt/azureus (and changed the load script as necessary), and it works fine.
When it asks you to upgrade to Vuze just say NO. I did that and because o
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 23:56 +0530, Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> >
> >> On a related note, is the presence of OpenSolaris, as against Solaris
> >> Express, the approved string for differentiating the different flavors
> >> o
I have a similar problem. I couldn't get the 64 bit drivers for the Marvell
Yukon onboard NIC built into an Asus P5-KVM motherboard to work. I think there
might be a bug or something in the installation script. Can somebody put a step
by step tutorial for how to install this in one of their blog
Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> Hypothetical question would be, if some one installed SUNWipkg on a
> SX*E, wouldn't the test for /usr/bin/pkg fail?
Depends what you need to know.
> I just need to get some tests (through shell) to differentiate the two
> flavors. Thanks
Why? What would you
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
>
>> On a related note, is the presence of OpenSolaris, as against Solaris
>> Express, the approved string for differentiating the different flavors
>> of Nevada? Thanks
>>
>
> There should be little you need to test for between
Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> On a related note, is the presence of OpenSolaris, as against Solaris
> Express, the approved string for differentiating the different flavors
> of Nevada? Thanks
There should be little you need to test for between the two flavors.
The main difference is IPS,
On a related note, is the presence of OpenSolaris, as against Solaris
Express, the approved string for differentiating the different flavors
of Nevada? Thanks
-Siva
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Look again at standards(5).
>
> Something like the following should work (simplified, i.e. I'm not us
Hi
here is hopefully less messy prtconf output.
model: 'Ethernet controller'
power-consumption: 0001.0001
66mhz-capable:
fast-back-to-back:
devsel-speed:
interrupts: 0001
max-latency: 000
Runned sun device detection tool and this device :
---
10de07600002104382e2a2
No Solaris Driver No Solaris Driver Network nVidia Corporation Unknown device
-
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Brian Utterback
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did I miss a memo? I just went to use easySMF at
> es.opensolaris.org/easySMF and it isn't there. Is this service no longer
> offered, or is something broken?
Don't know about that particular site, but you can download i
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ming Kin Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your remarks seem to suggest that the test for OS/compiler/library should be
> pushed up to the Makefile (or similar script) level, so that the application
> developer does not need to worry about testing for OS/compiler/l
Did I miss a memo? I just went to use easySMF at
es.opensolaris.org/easySMF and it isn't there. Is this service no longer
offered, or is something broken?
Brian Utterback
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Your remarks seem to suggest that the test for OS/compiler/library should be
pushed up to the Makefile (or similar script) level, so that the application
developer does not need to worry about testing for OS/compiler/library. But
isn't the Makefile author usually also the program author? Is it
13 matches
Mail list logo
