> ken mays wrote:
> [snip]
>> > Mark Martin wrote:
> [snip]
>> > Assuming you only use UFS and cut-down some system
>> > tuneables Solaris can
>> > run on a 64MB machine (my Ultra5 only has 128MB now after
>> > one of the
>> > DIMMs failed and it still works fine with CDE). The
>> > problems start
ken mays wrote:
[snip]
> > Mark Martin wrote:
[snip]
> > Assuming you only use UFS and cut-down some system
> > tuneables Solaris can
> > run on a 64MB machine (my Ultra5 only has 128MB now after
> > one of the
> > DIMMs failed and it still works fine with CDE). The
> > problems start if
> > you wa
--- On Thu, 1/1/09, Roland Mainz wrote:
> From: Roland Mainz
> Subject: [osol-discuss] Memory requirements of Solaris/OpenSolaris... / was:
> Re: [tools-discuss] Project Proposal -- Port to MIPSarchitecture
> To: "Mark Martin"
> Cc: emancipation-disc...@opensolaris.org, "Open Solaris"
> , too
Mark Martin wrote:
>
> [Resent for Reply-all]
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Bochnig
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Except that it would be nice if somebody would make the
> Polaris port functional, before starting a new port.
> Also, why MIPS, not ARM? Isn't MIPS dead a
