On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:34:28AM -0400, Fredrich Maney wrote:
> I will concur. The single most important issue to me with regards to
> installing a system is that I be able to do it automatically and
> remotely.
>
> I have quite literally installed thousands of Solaris instances on
> dozens of h
I have a small NAS box based on an Intel D945GCLF2 Atom 330 board. It
has a Realtek 8111C NIC using the rge driver. I'm running build
snv_118.
During periods of high network traffic, such as copying large files
over SMB to or from the system, the host becomes unreachable. It
doesn't respond to pin
Oracle 10g installs and runs OK.
I installed l SUNWmfrun, SUNWgcc, SUNWxwrtl, SUNWxorg-headers, maybe some other
packages ,
created oracle user in dba group, configured project for him (setting max
shared mamory and some other things), checked , that oracle user PATH includes
Solaris-tools firs
I am getting used to the opensolaris GUI.
The last time I used solaris was with version 1 (SunOS 4), but I am mainly a XP
user these days.
I am still looking for the following bits of information, hopefully with a GUI,
but I can use a prompt if I have to:
- regional setting (to do things like u
I am writing a script that allows any user(with appropriate permissions) to
install packages and start/stop some services on opensolaris. As far as i know
only Primary Administrator has the priviledge to perform these task. Is my
understanding correct or any other role allows similar privilege?
Hi,
This is a new installation from the GenUnix hosted DVD of OpenSolaris 1002
snv_118. After the normal setup I ran 'pkg install redistributable' ; then
separately installed the development bits. I have both SunStudioExpress and
sunstudio12u1. The former seems to be working fine, the latter d
I forgot to include the list in my original reply to Przemyslaw.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fredrich Maney
Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OT: Re: Oracle 10g on OpenSolaris (Solaris 5.11)
To: przemol...@poczta.fm
Przemyslaw,
No one has made th
Le 17 août 09 à 15:04, Chavdar Ivanov a écrit :
Hi,
This is a new installation from the GenUnix hosted DVD of
OpenSolaris 1002 snv_118. After the normal setup I ran 'pkg install
redistributable' ; then separately installed the development bits.
I have both SunStudioExpress and sunstudio
SNV101a:
Dec 28 01:00:10 s10services2 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ff0150456800:
Dec 28 01:00:10 s10services2 genunix: [ID 683410 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=e
(#pf Page fault) rp=ff000416ac10 addr=a
e1831b5
Dec 28 01:00:10 s10services2 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice]
Dec 28 01:00:10 s10
Four good sites to get you started:
http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/10_steps_to_opensolaris_laptop
http://planet.opensolaris.org/
www.opensolaris.com/use/network_administration.pdf
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Typo in the last: http://www.opensolaris.com/use/network_administration.pdf
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
casper@sun.com wrote:
That's your opinion of course, I and others pretty strongly disagree.
There are things that should absolutely be asked at install time.
However, install time is not the proper place to ask every possible
question someone might want to configure. There's a balance to b
Peter Tribble wrote:
To configure 'anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting. First you
tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you tell us that
it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
get it.
No, we've told you that you have to move your
>Peter Tribble wrote:
>> To configure 'anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting. First you
>> tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you tell us that
>> it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
>> get it.
>
>No, we've told you that you have
Peter Tribble wrote:
To configure 'anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting. First you
tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you tell us that
it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
get it.
Shawn Walker wrote:
No, we've told you that y
Sean,
You were correct. Lowering memory to 4GB allows the 32 bit cadp driver to work.
It seems that I have another issue with the running 2 of these cards. It seems
the card instance gets loaded over the first.
Got any recommendations of good scsi card + 64 bit driver combos?
--
This message p
casper@sun.com wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
To configure 'anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting. First you
tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you tell us that
it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
get it.
No, we've told you t
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
To configure 'anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting.
First you
tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you
tell us that
it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
get it.
Shawn Walker wrote:
N
Shawn Walker wrote:
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Yes, I think there is no getting away from arbitrary scripting, though
I understand the desire to move it out of the installation context.
That's funny, last I checked there have been OpenSolaris 200x releases
since 2008.05 without relying on arbitra
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Yes, I'm agreeing with you. The point of my message was:
1. We still need arbitrary scripting for configuration.
Although opportunities to enhance and simplify configuration such that
scripting is not required continue to be made (e.g. RBAC profiles and
others...). So n
Hi all,
In five weeks (Sept. 14th) all content on opensolaris.org will be
migrated to XWiki. To prepare your web pages for this migration, please
check the second test migration here:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/
If you find any problems, please refer to the tips and tricks for
The following message has been, or shortly will be, sent to the
mailing lists of the following Community Groups:
Appliances
Approachability
Chinese Users
Databases
Games on OpenSolaris
HPC Developer
Observability
OpenSolaris Printing
PowerPC
Solaris Volume Manager
Unix File Systems (UFS)
Hi,
It would be great to have the OpenPkg package management system
integrated with opensolaris' IPS GUI which allows users to access
binaries in RPM format for cross platform compatibility, it should
make it easier to get programs from Fedora/Redhat linux platforms to
run on opensolaris helping u
Spencer Tom Tafadzwa Chirume wrote:
Hi,
It would be great to have the OpenPkg package management system
integrated with opensolaris' IPS GUI which allows users to access
binaries in RPM format for cross platform compatibility, it should
make it easier to get programs from Fedora/Redhat linux pla
Where did you hear that 2009.06 doesn't make use of ECC? that is the first I
have heard of it...
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:40 PM, chris wrote:
> I am getting used to the opensolaris GUI.
> The last time I used solaris was with version 1 (SunOS 4), but I am mainly
> a XP user these days.
> I am s
What is the isue you are trying to address exactly anyway? If we are missing
packages our efforts would be better spent on getting those packages into
the existing framework rather than complicating our package management by
introducing additional frameworks.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Spenc
I test the console behavior with OSOL and came across something odd.
The automated testcases executes remotely by connecting to the machine's
virtual console thru the SC. It executes series of shell commands on the
console using Expect to help parse the output. From reviewing the logs,
it appear
I am not sure if I suppose to ask such a question?
I am in the process of building a samba file server running on home pc. The
hardware are new and all devices are in HCL. I am currently assessing Solaris
10 5/09 and OSol 2009.6
Both are default installation without patch(I do not have support
28 matches
Mail list logo
