thanks for your feedback.
actually, it`s also this mail which scares me to use opensolaris 32bit:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=266248
especially this post:
-
bhorn
Posts: 75
From: Menlo Park, CA
Registered: 9/5/06
Re: ZFS on 32bit.
P
> Marvell has the Solaris x64 Driver (64-bit) for Yukon Devices
> "yukonxsol_x64v10.0.3.3.tar.Z"
> (http://www.marvell.com/drivers/driverDisplay.do?driverId=180).
>
> ~ Ken Mays
I use this driver with a Marvell 88E8039 PCI-E on OpenSolaris 2009.06
and it works very well.
--
--
[...]
> furthermore, i have read several times, that 64bit
> solaris should preferred under all circumstances.
>
> that is a user`s opinion, but how does SUN think
> about that ?
What makes you think a company would necessarily
_have_ a policy on something like that?
Absent such a policy, why sh
man xrandr
man xorg.conf
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hi,
i install virtual box of osol, but when i try to install linux ubuntu64 or win
xp pro,
i have a same error messsage :
FATAL: No bootable medium found! System halted.
i use an best distribution 64bit but i don't understand.
thanks
philo
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Dear all,
I really love zfs.
What i want to do is to create a zfs based storage solution say 15 TB
from commodity hardware.
What I have:
software: opensolaris 0906, belenix and solaris 10.
hardware: 2 normal machines == core2duo and amd dual core, 2 gig's of
RAM each, motherboard has the ca
Dear all,
the current scenario:
storage and application that needs that data are on the same machine.
1. software raid on ubuntu for the storage.
2. the app that needs the data runs only on linux.
3. the data is multimedia files, lots of them, small, big and very big
etc.
what i want to achie
I tried this on b124 and noticed that header no longer exists. Instead use:
#include
But then I get another error:
tvctrlpt/linux/upnp_tv_ctrlpt_main.c: In function 'main':
tvctrlpt/linux/upnp_tv_ctrlpt_main.c:432: error: too many arguments to function
'sigwait'
gmake[3]: *** [tvctrlpt/linux/
It seems likely that this error is not a problem since it is in a sample. I
installed anyway with pfexec gmake -k install
The next step was to see if gmediaserver would compile. Of course, it does
not. Aside from needing to include again in some files,
Next I had to comment out a line in w
Go to virtualbox.org forum and ask there.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
roland wrote:
thanks for your feedback.
actually, it`s also this mail which scares me to use opensolaris 32bit:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=266248
Why? This message is a broadcast of the previously mentioned bug,
6634371, by the person who filed it. What additional
You could add one of these
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815121009
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>What makes you think a company would necessarily
>_have_ a policy on something like that
they make it available and i don`t read from sun something like "please don`t
use, we don`t support it as good as 64bit"
if i would read"made just for your convenience, use at your own risk" somewhere
that
Hello,
Please excuse my ignorance as a totally new user of OpenSolaris (and unix/linux
systems!).
Is there a way to easily install alternative window mangers such as Openbox or
Fluxbox for this system? I've got two questions that are more specific:
1. Are there any specific tips for compiling an
As a new user, I am wondering if there are any implications for OpenSolaris
after Sun is acquired by Oracle? Will there be any impact on me as an end user?
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensol
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
> As a new user, I am wondering if there are any implications for OpenSolaris
> after Sun is acquired by Oracle? Will there be any impact on me as an end
> user? Thanks!
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> __
As already stated due to the ongoing acquisition process you wont see any
sun folk making statements. Oracle statements are contained at
http://www.oracle.com/us/sun/index.htm
I don't believe Oracle would damage the fantastic work that has been done to
build this community.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 a
KDE is available for OpenSolaris. I saw a thread on this, somewhere here. For
the others, I dont know. I suspect it is difficult to compile them for
Opensolaris, and the easiest is to look for packages. Look here and google for
packages?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Dear All,
I'd tried freshly installing b124/x86 using 1/2-segment DVD images
and on both cases, the terminal on root window popup menu
flash and exit, using Accessory->Terminal had no problems.
Any hints to have that fixed?
Best wishes,
Clarence CHU
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Clarence CHU wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'd tried freshly installing b124/x86 using 1/2-segment DVD images
> and on both cases, the terminal on root window popup menu
> flash and exit, using Accessory->Terminal had no problems.
>
> Any hints to have that fixed?
If your shell is /bin/ksh, change it t
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Arun Tomar wrote:
> hi!
>
> i've an hp office jet all in one f4288. the printer gets detected and
> works if i configure cups but the scanner doesn't. sane gives the error
>
> a...@opensolaris:~# scanimage -L
>
> No scanners were identified. If you were expecting s
I agree as a workstation/desktop/laptop user that bluetooth is important,
not as essential as 802.11[abgn] but definitely something that should be on
the roadmap.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 06:05, Peter Jones wrote:
> With a business hat on its a question of strategy and focus of limited
> resource
22 matches
Mail list logo
