Ah, ok, that clears things up a bit ;-)
I don't have a second box handy, so i'll need to hobby around a bit with VMware.
May take a couple of days, I appreciate your efforts though !
Thx,
J.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I installed open solaris snv_111b on vmware esxi. using below commands i tried
to update to dev releases
$ pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev opensolaris.org
$ pfexec pkg image-update
After this it creates opensolaris-1 . When i try to boot opensoalris-1 from GNU
GRUB
Hey all,
I've run into a bit of a show-stopper:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12831
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Anybody know if this will be fixed in OpenSolaris 2010.xx?
When I say fixed, I mean either a fixed version of smbfs that can handle
My business is running a very mixed environment. We have both Linux and Windows
(and one Mac), and now I'm looking into adding OpenSolaris to the mix.
Our fileservers are all running Samba. On the Linux machines shares are
accessed using mount.cifs. Each user simply mounts the relevant shares
I think that this is a problem with VMware and not a problem with OpenSolaris,
and since VMware is a closed-source proprietary architecture, there is nothing
we can do to help since only VMware has the source code for their software. If
you purchased a support contract from VMware then you can
It's three years old!
Touche! I didn't even look at the date. Still the article was lame. I was
hoping for more outrage. Currently very disappointed with the lack of outrage
and snide remarks from the OpenSolaris community about this ;-)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 01/ 5/10 12:19 PM, andrew wrote:
That's interesting - I guess you do need an on-disk
format for that. There are two obvious use cases for
a file-based package: 1 is to do an OS install, the
other is to just add packages to a system after you
download them. It is sometimes quicker to
I presume that Solaris simply doesn't implement the right functions.
I'd love to be corrected.
Ok zetetic, so I'll love to correct you then. I think Solaris actually does
implement the right functions for S.M.A.R.T., and you actually can get
S.M.A.R.T. data (and much more) on Solaris 10
Hey all,
My current backup system consists of a rsync/tarball combination, where rsync
syncs the X directories to a remote server via SSH. When rsync is done, a
tarball containing all the files and directories is created on the backup
server.
The result is a backup server where there's a
Le 7 janv. 10 à 12:09, Thomas Løcke a écrit :
Hey all,
Hi,
My current backup system consists of a rsync/tarball combination,
where rsync syncs the X directories to a remote server via SSH. When
rsync is done, a tarball containing all the files and directories is
created on the backup
If I need to recover a file from 10 days back, I just grab the
10 day old tarball and restore the file from that. All the remaining
tarballs remain as is. If I do the same with a ZFS snapshot, I'd have
to destroy all the snapshots done between the latest and the 10 day old
one, meaning all
Hi,
I getting the error export: couldn't set locale correctly while trying to
execute the below command in my profile
export LANG=en_US
Could someone encounter the same problem?
Regards
Malai
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I've wondered about this one also. As long as you are behind the dhcp service
which has its own firewall and what I have tied behind a static IP the network
icon links any windows shares no problem. I'd have to guess any ciber cafe
assigning the dhcp service would immediately have the same
On the surface it looked like the perfect match: Run rsync, and when
done, take a ZFS snapshot.
It is, and if you turn on compression, it is better than perfect ;-)
And with dedup, it will be even better.
Compression and dedup are indeed cool. Be conscious of the side-effects.
They
I installed open solaris snv_111b on vmware esxi.
...
When i try to
boot opensoalris-1 from GNU GRUB Menu it dumps some
junk output and navigates back to GRUB Menu screen.
I think that is a known problem:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6837
Or
Which shell are you using and which OS is this?
I'm guessing it's ksh, so I guess you're using Solaris 10? It could be
Bourne shell /bin/sh, but this also implies Solaris 10.
From the info you've given, I'd say the en_US locale is not installed.
locale -a will list all available locales.
Hello,
Bug 6695198: OpenSolaris / Nevada do not probe Intel SS4200-EHW on-board PATA
controller. The last entry I can see is this: Is it possible to access this
machine remotely for debugging?
I'm not sure who to tell or ask this, but I can provide a remote serial
connection to an Intel
Laurens Vets wrote:
Hello,
Bug 6695198: OpenSolaris / Nevada do not probe Intel SS4200-EHW on-board PATA
controller. The last entry I can see is this: Is it possible to access this
machine remotely for debugging?
I'm not sure who to tell or ask this, but I can provide a remote serial
check to see if you have the SUNWlang-enUS package installed.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 01/ 7/10 03:22 AM, Thomas Løcke wrote:
Hey all,
I've run into a bit of a show-stopper:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12831
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Anybody know if this will be fixed in OpenSolaris 2010.xx?
When I say fixed, I mean either
On 01/ 7/10 04:20 AM, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Actually it would work better if the common installed base was quite large to
begin with. :)
I'm just curious how data is collected on other distributions of opensolaris
initial installs and
if it's combined in with the you mentioned. One obvious
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
On the surface it looked like the perfect match: Run rsync, and when
done, take a ZFS snapshot.
It is, and if you turn on compression, it is better than perfect ;-)
And with dedup, it will be even better.
Compression and dedup are indeed cool. Be
Nope.
It's clear you're misunderstanding something here.
To restore something from zfs snapshot, assuming your
zfs filesystem is
/backupdrive what you do is ... Look in
/backupdrive/.zfs/ and you'll see
all the previous copies of the filesystem. You can
copy files out of there,
and
So far supposedly bootable ISOs of OpenSolaris and Centos 5.4 fail
attempts to create a VM from those DVD's gets complaint media not
bootable.
After starting VirtualBox 3.1.2, entering the vdi's parameters, load the
boot-ISO into the Super-Drive replies, select, replies ... NO BOOTABLE
MEDIA
Yea, but before I knew about the .zfs/snapshot directory,
thought my only option was to destroy snapshots all the
way back to the one I wanted, and then restore from that,
hence resetting the state to that point in time.
If for some reason you don't want to use the .zfs snapdir feature, you
I've never found a need to burn images to disk to use them with VBox,
so I'm not sure this is a problem you need to solve to address your
fundamental requirements, at least as I understand them. All of the
installs I've done have simply used the .iso files themselves, which
the media
Batey, Everett II NAVSEA wrote:
So far supposedly bootable ISOs of OpenSolaris and Centos 5.4 fail
attempts to create a VM from those DVD's gets complaint media not
bootable.
After starting VirtualBox 3.1.2, entering the vdi's parameters, load the
boot-ISO into the Super-Drive replies, select,
Wow, talk about a difficult thing to track down.
I've scoured all over, found various non-complete lists where the poster says
'I wish there was a complete list'. The HCL lists *some* things, but it's not
all-inclusive.
Is there any knowledge base which just reports working hardware like Linux
I didn't find any mention of this chipset during a search - any idea if this
will be supported?
Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I tried this on a physical x86 box. The upgrade from snv111 build to latest dev
build goes through fine. But after i reboot and log in to the box
bash-3.00$ ssh -l admin machine name
Password:
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_130 November 2008
As you can see above it has upgraded to
(2009/12/27 0:34), Masafumi Ohta wrote:
Hi guys
I cant login on b130 with Japanese environment.
almost of you know gdm login have changed in b130.
you should login with login button first and
then you should input usename and password in the field.
(when installing as well)
but in Japanese we
31 matches
Mail list logo
