On 22 feb 2010, at 15:02, Thomas Burgess wrote:
>
> you're lucky. It didn't work for me. I got caught in a catch 22
> i'd do attach -u and it would fail, then i'd do attach (without -u) and it
> would tell me to do attach -u
>
Did you do the detach after the image-update ? That was a mistake
Hi,
W. Wayne Liauh píše v út 23. 02. 2010 v 17:10 -0800:
> But b133 (LiveCD) still failed to boot from two of our three test machines
> (both are with multi-core, at least 4 GB DDR2, one with ATI HD graphics the
> other with Intel chip). On the one machine that it successfully boots (HP
> dv3,
It should be there now as of yesterday.
-- Alan
On 02/23/10 10:46 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen Parham wrote:
Should we be lobbying the VirtualBox folks then? Is there a better venue to do
that?
I'm really eagerly awaiting 3.1 due to the improved USB/Aud
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Alan Steinberg wrote:
> It should be there now as of yesterday.
Yeah, I've noticed that two moments after I hit "Send". (Learned my lesson)
>
> -- Alan
>
> On 02/23/10 10:46 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen Parham wrote:
>>
>>>
Uh oh... slashdot is claiming that the writing is on the wall for OpenSolaris.
I won't let this stupid FUD get to my head though... I know we can let OSol
persist even without Oracle in the mix...
Matt
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
I feel that your best bet is to just take the code and form an opensource
foundation.The issues with licensing and name maybe need to be resolved.However
the distro needs a strategy, business plan,revenue projections and reson
detre.This may involve change beyond what the community would feel co
+1 trickii :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hello all,
i have a web site on os2009.06 with webstack that needs netpbm and pnmtopng:
jpegtopnm: WRITING PPM FILE
giftopnm: Reading Image Sequence 0
pnmscale: promoting from PBM to PGM
sh: pngtopnm: not found
pnmscale: Error reading magic number from Netpbm image stream. Most
often, this mean
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit weak
on real content--still something about OpenSolaris made it on slashdot:
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/02/24/0120245/The-Future-of-
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee wrote:
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit weak
on real content--still something about OpenSolaris made it on slashdot:
http://dev
How often do you find the dips in performance? Is that period repeatable? I am
suspecting the time when the data are dumped from memory to disk, writes
dominate the disks and reads slow considerably.
Scott
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:51:20 -0500, Paul Griffith wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee wrote:
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit weak
on real content--still
slashdot and osnews is more in favour of linux than anything. I think opensol
discussion groups are best for opensolaris news than these external websites.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-disc
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee
> wrote:
>
> > Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short
> article on Phronix about the not-so-bright future of
> OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit
> weak on real content--still something about
> OpenSolaris made it on slashd
On 02/24/10 05:17 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Yeah, when the news doesn't fit our liking, we can always discredit the source.
:-)
I thought the same thing, just a little differently. The Opensolaris
mail exploders can be viewed to be biased towards Opensolaris.
Having said that, I
What I see in b133 is this:
$ CC test.cc
CC: Fatal error in ld: Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
ld: fatal: file /opt/sunstudio12.1/prod/lib/crti.o: section [9].rela.annotate
has invalid type [ SHT_RELA ]
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
An old bug. You need to update the compiler.
However, I don't know how to do that on OpenSolaris.
I just rsync the updated compiler from a Solaris 10 machine.
Ginn
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:13 PM, William Kucharski wrote:
> What I see in b133 is this:
>
> $ CC test.cc
> CC: Fatal error in ld: Segm
Hello,
On osol-b133 noticed that the first call to vmstat always yields a
significantly different figure for freemem than the subsequent calls :
# vmstat 2
kthr memorypagedisk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr cd s0 -- -- in sy
18 matches
Mail list logo
