Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Here's how I interpret all of this: I think
they're shifting some
percentage of developers from opensolaris to
solaris. Instead of letting
opensolaris lead the way, and trickle down with
open source contributions
to solaris ... Solaris will lead the way,
I'm looking at merging/replacing ncrs with glm. However, there are some
devices that ncrs supports that glm doesn't. I'm hypothesizing that
such devices are so old that its likely that nobody has them.
If you use ncrs, I'd like to see:
prtconf -vp | grep pci1000
Also, are you willing to
Will there be a SPARC liveCD for OpenSolaris 2010.03 ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Tue, 3/2/10, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Here's how I interpret all of this: I think they're shifting some
percentage of developers from opensolaris to solaris. Instead of letting
opensolaris lead the way, and trickle down
Here's how I interpret all of this: I think they're shifting some
percentage of developers from opensolaris to solaris. Instead of
letting
opensolaris lead the way, and trickle down with open source
contributions
to solaris ... Solaris will lead the way, and contributions will
On 02/03/2010 14:24, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Here's how I interpret all of this: I think they're shifting some
percentage of developers from opensolaris to solaris. Instead of
letting
opensolaris lead the way, and trickle down with open source
contributions
to solaris ... Solaris will lead
On 03/ 1/10 06:19 PM, valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
...
A quick question on flash player: can you get the beta 10.1b3 release working?
The reason that I ask is about GPU acceleration. There is much better GPU
acceleration in the Windows version that doesn't appear in Linux (at least)
because the
Dan Pitic wrote:
Will there be a SPARC liveCD for OpenSolaris 2010.03 ?
No, since most supported SPARC systems won't have graphics.
SPARC systems will still just have install CD's, not live
GUI desktop images that can be run as a desktop and include
an install GUI.
--
-Alan
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I know if I were working for Oracle, that would make total sense to me. As
a matter of branding, they could even change the name. Instead of calling
it solaris next they could simply call it oracle next.
Solaris Next is a code name, not branding. It's shorthand for
I have just installed OpenSolaris snv_133 X86 (15 February 2010). I am now
trying to install HA Cluster. Can someone tell where I can download HA Cluster
from for this build and also are there any instructions for this?
I have tried to use the OpenHACluster Installation Guide for 2009 06 but
Is there any news on the 2010.03 release? I thought it was slated for
yesterday (1st March) having already slipped by a month...
Ben
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
due March 26 according to official page
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Ben ben.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any news on the 2010.03 release? I thought it was slated for
yesterday (1st March) having already slipped by a month...
Ben
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ben wrote:
Is there any news on the 2010.03 release? I thought it was slated for
yesterday (1st March) having already slipped by a month...
It was never slated for the first of the month, always the end of the month, as
posted in the URL's linked to previously in this thread.
--
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I know if I were working for Oracle, that would
make total sense to me. As
a matter of branding, they could even change the
name. Instead of calling
it solaris next they could simply call it oracle
next.
Solaris Next is a code name, not branding. It's
On 03/ 2/10 09:54 AM, Tony Williams wrote:
I have just installed OpenSolaris snv_133 X86 (15 February 2010). I am now
trying to install HA Cluster. Can someone tell where I can download HA Cluster
from for this build and also are there any instructions for this?
I have tried to use the
Ha ha! Apologies, I didn't see that.
I thought that the beginning of the month would have been a nice idea.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:06 PM, James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 03/ 1/10 11:50 PM, I. Szczesniak wrote:
Please restart the timer for 2010/067. The case directory didn't
publish its materials yet.
There are two issues with this:
1. It's not an open case
On 02/03/2010 20:36, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Can I somehow disable the ZIL in an irresponsible way, to establish
the upper bound for performance on my system?
unmount a zfs filesystem you want to test by: zfs unmount pool/fs1
then do: echo 'zil_disable/W1 | mdb -kw'
then mount the
I downloaded and installed OpenOffice 3.2 last night
on my snv_133 x64 system, the only hiccup I saw was
the Next button being grayed out on the initial
setup screen - but clicking the Help button, then
returning to the initial setup screen resulted in it
becoming available (weird), after
Since I've been at Sun, Solaris Next has been used for Solaris 8, 9, and 10
at various phases.
Maybe Oracle could rename it from Solaris Next to Solaris (N + 1) or if
we could just get IPS to be as fast as blastwave's pkgutil or Nexenta's
apt-get, we could call it (Solaris)^2 (a.k.a.
On Mar 2, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I have a system with a bunch of disks, and I’d like to know how much faster
it would be if I had an SSD for the ZIL; however, I don’t have the SSD and I
don’t want to buy one right now. The reasons are complicated, but it’s not a
cost
Hi,
This is my first mail in opensolaris mailing list, and I am new to
opensolairs(solaris), before I am a slackware user.
I want to compile a software, the compile shell is below:
aclocal-1.10 -I /usr/share/aclocal-1.10 || exit 1
autoheader || exit 2
automake-1.10 --add-missing --copy
Hi there - would any one be willing to spend a short amount of time to help me
diag a problem with presenting LUN's. I've followed the instructions and I'm
getting now where fast. If you would be willing I would also be willing to
compensate as well to get me out of this jamm.
--
This
Will the SPARC install CD be something similar to the text installer for
Solaris 10 when installing ZFS as a root file system?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello Dan,
On Mar 3, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Dan Pitic wrote:
Will the SPARC install CD be something similar to the text installer for
Solaris 10 when installing ZFS as a root file system?
--
That depends what you mean with similar, yeas it's a tty-based installer, but
it's not based on the
25 matches
Mail list logo
