> --
> -Alan Coopersmith-
> - alan.coopersm...@sun.com
> Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window
> ow System
>
You have just inadvertently answered an important question that many of us are
wondering: Will OpenSolaris survive? I think the answer now is terribly clear,
even f
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> Yeah, except I am not an ARC member. I don't know about you, but if I were a
> Sun employee and have the power to withhold my approval until the submitter
> does something as I asked, I will definitely be more friendly in my tone.
I saw absolutely nothing unfriendly in S
Out of respect for the Countess of Lovelace, Ada is generally spelled as a
proper name with initial caps. It is a programming language named after Lady
Ada who was considered to be the first programmer.
Other languages in all caps are [frequently] acronyms such as COBOL('COmmon
Business-Orie
> > I believe anyone expecting any engineer to know
> all
> > the parts of
> > the system is woefully underestimating just how
> much
> > software we
> > have and what you consider to be "common
> knowledge"
> > is not as
> > common as you think.
>
> Yeah, except I am not an ARC member. I don't k
> I believe anyone expecting any engineer to know all
> the parts of
> the system is woefully underestimating just how much
> software we
> have and what you consider to be "common knowledge"
> is not as
> common as you think.
Yeah, except I am not an ARC member. I don't know about you, but if I
> Thanks it works. I cleared the cache in /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages
Please sure to be running the latest pkgutil which enforces hash checks on
packages. You can get that at blastwave.network.com/csw and other than
that watch for updates coming out in the next hour or just real real soon
now.
Thanks it works. I cleared the cache in /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I get this error msg.
>
> A local copy of CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 exists and is of matching
> size.
> MD5 for CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 doesn't match catalog! at
> /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 696, line 1.
Also, take a look in the pkgutil cache area /var/opt/csw/pkgutil and clear
ou
> I get this error msg.
>
> A local copy of CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 exists and is of matching
> size.
> MD5 for CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 doesn't match catalog! at
> /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 696, line 1.
I'm not too sure how that is happening. However, if you can wait one hour
(
I get this error msg.
A local copy of CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 exists and is of matching size.
MD5 for CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 doesn't match catalog! at
/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 696, line 1.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> I believe ALL of the questions that you asked are common knowledge in the
> open source community. Perhaps some of the ARC lords should do some due
> diligence before exercising their lordship?
I believe anyone expecting any engineer to know all the parts of
the system i
On 03/08/10 08:30, Bruno Damour wrote:
OK I understand, I cannot remove them !
Sorry for the noise
Still it would have been nicer to get SunStudioi, Openoffice, etc... depend on
the new pkgs, guess time will come soon ;-)
Bruno
Right now these packages cannot depend on the new names because t
Hi all,
I am a newbie for OpenSolaris. I anstalled the OS successfully now i
want to install weblogic application server on it. When i tried to install
using jar file downloaded from oracle website i am getting an error says
"A fatal error has occurred. This application will terminate.
> On 03/ 8/10 01:04 AM, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun
> Microsystems wrote:
> > This case has been approved with +1.
> >
>
> I did give this case a +1, but there is still an
> unanswered question
> (see my mail from the 3rd). Please answer that
> question before
> approving the case.
>
> -Seb
> __
> On 03/ 8/10 02:20 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>>> Per LSARC/2009/575, the gcc-runtime-432 package is now obsolete and was
>>> refactored into the following new packages:
>>>
>>> developer/gcc/gcc-libgcc
>>> developer/gcc/gcc-libgfortran
>>> developer/gcc/gcc-libgomp
>>> developer/gcc/gcc-libobjc
On 03/ 8/10 02:20 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Per LSARC/2009/575, the gcc-runtime-432 package is now obsolete and was
refactored into the following new packages:
developer/gcc/gcc-libgcc
developer/gcc/gcc-libgfortran
developer/gcc/gcc-libgomp
developer/gcc/gcc-libobjc
developer/gcc/gcc-libssp
dev
> On 03/ 8/10 11:08 AM, John Martin wrote:
>> I upgraded from b133 to b134 using the internal /dev repository.
>> There was a notice it was removing the gcc 4.3.2 packages
>> gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432. After the upgrade, package manager
>> shows gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432 as empty packages with
On 03/ 8/10 11:08 AM, John Martin wrote:
I upgraded from b133 to b134 using the internal /dev repository.
There was a notice it was removing the gcc 4.3.2 packages
gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432. After the upgrade, package manager
shows gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432 as empty packages with a
new packag
> BTW, have you done anything about > running the OpenOffice.org
> plugin in NetBeans? > > /blockquote> >
> No, haven't done anything with the Openoffice > NetBeans plugin.
>
> Paul
>
Just a note to self-- Geertjan has a brief blog entry on integrating
OpenOffice.org into the NetBeans Platform:
I upgraded from b133 to b134 using the internal /dev repository.
There was a notice it was removing the gcc 4.3.2 packages
gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432. After the upgrade, package manager
shows gcc-432 and gcc-runtime-432 as empty packages with a
new package gcc-43 which appears to be gcc 4.3.3.
OK I understand, I cannot remove them !
Sorry for the noise
Still it would have been nicer to get SunStudioi, Openoffice, etc... depend on
the new pkgs, guess time will come soon ;-)
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-dis
On 03/ 5/10 09:28 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
I just upgraded from b125 to b133 last night.
Anytime I try to do anything with pkg, I see the following errors:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module rand: This Python
has API version 1013, module rand has version 1012.
It would appea
May be not ALL are renamed :
# pkg list |grep SUNW
SUNWPython2.4.6-0.133 installed --r--
SUNWPython26 2.6.4-0.133 installed --r--
SUNWarc 0.5.11-0.133installed --r--
SUNWbzip
Bruno Damour wrote:
> I've notice that in my (freshly installed) b133 some packages still appear
> with old names.
Which ones? A few packages in the /dev repo were not renamed, such as SUNWcs.
Renames for other repos I believe are also still to be done.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Bruno Damour wrote:
> Hello,
> I've notice that in my (freshly installed) b133 some packages still appear
> with old names.
> It seems they are packages required by some stuff from the extra repository,
> still in 'release' version, namely openoffice and sunstudio
Hello,
I've notice that in my (freshly installed) b133 some packages still appear with
old names.
It seems they are packages required by some stuff from the extra repository,
still in 'release' version, namely openoffice and sunstudio12u1 (maybe others).
Is there anything I can do to force the re
On 03/ 5/10 03:28 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
I just upgraded from b125 to b133 last night.
Anytime I try to do anything with pkg, I see the following errors:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module rand: This Python
has API version 1013, module rand has version 1012.
Seems lik
27 matches
Mail list logo
