Re: [osol-discuss] What is STOREDGE In SOLARIS?

2010-05-19 Thread Thommy M . Malmström
Long answer: A1000 = http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/A1000/A1000 D1000 = http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/D1000/D1000 T3 = http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/T3/T3 These are all old storage

Re: [osol-discuss] What is STOREDGE In SOLARIS?

2010-05-19 Thread Svein Skogen
On 19.05.2010 09:29, Thommy M. Malmström wrote: Short answer: JFGI Less polite answer: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=storegde //Svein -- +---+--- /\ |Svein Skogen | sv...@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg Østli 9| PGP Key: 0xE5E76831

Re: [osol-discuss] What is STOREDGE In SOLARIS?

2010-05-19 Thread Svein Skogen
On 19.05.2010 09:42, Svein Skogen wrote: On 19.05.2010 09:29, Thommy M. Malmström wrote: Short answer: JFGI Less polite answer: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=storegde I blame that typo on blood in my caffeine-stream, that link should have been: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=storedge //Svein --

Re: [osol-discuss] Support options for Opensolaris?

2010-05-19 Thread Thommy M . Malmström
Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Run ksh -c 'integer -a z=( [1]=90 ) ; function x { nameref nz=$1 ; print $((log10(nz)))==$((log10($nz))) ; } ; x z[1]' Actual Results: The shell will print: -inf==1.95424250943932487459005580651023 Expected Results: The shell should print

Re: [osol-discuss] What is STOREDGE In SOLARIS?

2010-05-19 Thread Thommy M . Malmström
On 19.05.2010 09:42, Svein Skogen wrote: On 19.05.2010 09:29, Thommy M. Malmström wrote: Short answer: JFGI Less polite answer: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=storegde I blame that typo on blood in my caffeine-stream, that link should have been: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=storedge

[osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Christian Pélissier
Have a look at : http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b134b/ http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] unsubscribe

2010-05-19 Thread Nico Sabbi
___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] unsubscribe

2010-05-19 Thread James Grisanzio
On 05/19/10 17:08, Nico Sabbi wrote: ___ I unsubscribed you. In the future you can subscribe and unsubscribe here: http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-discuss Jim ___

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Wouter Portegjs
and what about the http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/20100508/ dir ;) Something might be cooking? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Uros Nedic
It is consolidation from May 8th this year - not OSOL 2010.05.Certainly something is cooking but not at this place :). Uros Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 02:49:15 -0700 From: wporteg...@gmail.com To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05 and what

[osol-discuss] Closed Binary Problem in b111b build/installation on OpenSolaris 2009.06

2010-05-19 Thread anand bibhuti
During the course of b111b build/installation , i have read that problem of closed binaries frequently occur. To resolve the closed binary problem following steps have been suggested . 8 #cd /export/home/build/b111b/closed/root_i386/usr/lib/security # mv

[osol-discuss] bash history and su

2010-05-19 Thread Bruno Damour
Hello, I noticed that in the last versions of osol (I'm running b134), the bash history of commands is the same if I am logged in as a normal user and if i use su (from this same user). I do not remember that it used to be the case before ? I think when su-ed in it used to be the root bash

[osol-discuss] zhist good enough for usage

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
The purpose of zhist is to simplify access to past snapshots. For example, if you zhist ls somefile then the results will be: A list of all the previous snapshot versions of that file or directory. No need to find the right .zfs directory, or check to see which ones have changed. Some

Re: [osol-discuss] bash history and su

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris- discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Damour I noticed that in the last versions of osol (I'm running b134), the bash history of commands is the same if I am logged in as a normal user and if i use su (from

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread russell
Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ A couple of points with the What's new [i]With this new functionality, users are still limited to a single OpenSolaris partition, whether it is primary or

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread solarg
On 05/19/10 02:37 PM, russell wrote: Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ A couple of points with the What's new what is surprising is the inclusion of CDE chunks: cde/calendar-manager-server

[osol-discuss] ssh coredumps when used with vnc on b134

2010-05-19 Thread solarg
hello all, on my laptop, os20xx.xx b134, i'm using vncviewer thru ssh like this: vncviewer -shared -passwd passwd -via MY_SERVER the MY_SERVER is a solaris 10 machine, running vncserver (from SUNWxvnc). Examning the core file: he...@tara:~$ pstack core core 'core' of 7397: /usr/bin/ssh -f -L

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Paul Griffith
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 15:04 +0200, solarg wrote: On 05/19/10 02:37 PM, russell wrote: Nice to see that Whats new in OpenSolaris 2010.05 details below http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new-2010-05/ A couple of points with the What's new what is surprising is

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Dmitry G. Kozhinov
Sadly no OpenVPN! Yes, some kind of VPN client please! Hope developers are listening... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Ashish Nabira
There is download link for 2010.05, but it is pointing to 2009.06. When new opensolaris will be ready to download ? Ashish Nabira Enterprise IT Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. 7th floor , Prestige Obelisk, Kasturba Rd Bangalore, KN 560025 IN Phone x89854/+91 8066930 854 Mobile

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread ken mays
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Ashish Nabira nab...@sun.com wrote: There is download link for 2010.05, but it is pointing to 2009.06. When new opensolaris will be ready to download ? Ashish Nabira Enterprise IT Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. You'll see the announcement in opensolaris-announce

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Alan Coopersmith
solarg wrote: what is surprising is the inclusion of CDE chunks: cde/calendar-manager-serverCDE calendar manager service daemon cde/cde-utilitiesCDE Utilities cde/help-viewerCDE Help Runtime Those are portions of CDE that were purposely excluded from the

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Support options for Opensolaris?

2010-05-19 Thread Josh Hurst
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Nicholas George nicholas.george.homeoff...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello list, we wish to have the bug below handled ASAP and are looking for at least a year of full support for our existing Sun hardware running Opensolaris. Which support options does Oracle

Re: [osol-discuss] Support options for Opensolaris?

2010-05-19 Thread Josh Hurst
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote: You'll have to talk to a Oracle Sales Rep directly to get information about Support options for OpenSolaris. This has been changing over the past month(s), so please talk to the SaleReps - the various

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Calum Benson
On 19 May 2010, at 14:04, solarg wrote: i'd also prefer to see Qt libs, and the possibility to switch user in gnome, as in other distros... Re user switching, you used to be able to enable it as follows -- don't know if this still works, though:

Re: [osol-discuss] b134b / 2010.05

2010-05-19 Thread Calum Benson
On 19 May 2010, at 19:31, solarg wrote: that's the point, it doesn't work! instead, it just launches the screensaver ... i don't understand why, if gnome is the same for linux distros and opensolaris? and does it manage the sound when you switch user? User switching depends on a lot of

[osol-discuss] What is eating my memory in ZFS

2010-05-19 Thread dd pn
Hello, I am sure this question has been asked before but I am trying to figure out what is eating my memory. We have zfs_arc cache set up in our /etc/system to 4GB but we want to know how much memory is being used for any application at any time? Is there any command in Solaris 10 that tells

[osol-discuss] image-update incredibly slow

2010-05-19 Thread Antoine Benkemoun
Hello, I am trying to update an OpenSolaris 2009.06 Xen VM (dom0 is Debian Lenny) from build 111 to 134. It is incredibly slow, you can't even imagine... Yesterday, I started the process at 11PM and at 6PM today it crashed towards the end of the installation phase. I stopped it then and

Re: [osol-discuss] What is eating my memory in ZFS

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris- discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of dd pn but we want to know how much memory is being used for any application at any time? Use blastwave or opencsw. Install top.

Re: [osol-discuss] image-update incredibly slow

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris- discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Benkemoun I am trying to update an OpenSolaris 2009.06 Xen VM (dom0 is Debian Lenny) from build 111 to 134. It is incredibly slow, you can't even imagine... I hope

Re: [osol-discuss] What is eating my memory in ZFS

2010-05-19 Thread Ian Collins
On 05/20/10 11:09 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris- discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of dd pn but we want to know how much memory is being used for any application at any time? Use blastwave or opencsw. Install

Re: [osol-discuss] zhist good enough for usage

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: Darren Kenny [mailto:dke...@opensolaris.org] Have you seen the GUI equivalent to this in nautilus in 2009.06 and later builds? Thanks for the suggestion. I have heard of time slider before, but it's only available in the solaris/opensolaris gui, and (does it work across a network or

Re: [osol-discuss] What is eating my memory in ZFS

2010-05-19 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: Ian Collins [mailto:i...@ianshome.com] Use blastwave or opencsw. Install top. In the context of the original question, what does top offer that prstat does not? I said top. You said prstat. Whatever you like. ___ opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] Support options for Opensolaris?

2010-05-19 Thread ольга крыжановская
Nicholas, I uploaded a i686 ksh93 binary tar ball for Opensolaris B134 or better to http://www.nrubsig.org/people/fleyta/opensolaris/posixcore/opensolaris_ksh20100309_i686_20100520_rev2102.tar.bz2 The binaries contain a fix which should solve your problem and a new test suite module

Re: [osol-discuss] What is eating my memory in ZFS

2010-05-19 Thread Benjamin Brumaire
try either http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/resource/arcstat.pl or http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=979 bbr -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] An effort to rally around - building a real, community driven distro...

2010-05-19 Thread John Plocher
Re: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=129430tstart=15 As Dennis said, We are in a situation after some five years of the OpenSolaris community where one can not simply download sources and build something runnable. We can not even bootstrap the kernel without special corporate