Re: [osol-discuss] Anonymous NFS file permissions

2010-09-30 Thread valrh...@gmail.com
Thanks! It seems to be working now! I really appreciate the help! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Calum Benson
On 30 Sep 2010, at 02:44, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but the update 9 of Solaris 10 has finally switched to OpenOffice.org. Thus, it seems that Oracle also silently RIP'd StarOffice (actually the decision was already made during Sun's time). IIRC,

[osol-discuss] XWiki Update on Monday Oct 4

2010-09-30 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Following the updates to auth/repo last week, we are now ready to update XWiki on Monday Oct 4th starting at 5 a.m. PDT. XWiki will be down for approximately 1/2 hour. In this deployment XWiki will have a new lightweight skin, which has better organization for layout and page editing.

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Sendmail

2010-09-30 Thread Kartik Vashishta
I just got off the phone with the email admin here. Seems they have shut off the relaying feature (anti-spam effort). Only mailbox accounts can send and recieve mail. So looks like im not going to be able to use this or any internal mail server I would like to try to configure my server to route

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Octave Orgeron
Hi, Contrary to popular believe there are still some major differences between OpenOffice and the StarOffice code base. StarOffice has closed source bits around MS Office translation and printer support that are absent in OpenOffice. I've found that StarOffice is better with MS compatibility

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Sendmail

2010-09-30 Thread Hugh McIntyre
Kartik Vashishta wrote: I just got off the phone with the email admin here. Seems they have shut off the relaying feature (anti-spam effort). Only mailbox accounts can send and recieve mail. So looks like im not going to be able to use this or any internal mail server I would like to try to

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Edward Martinez
What I find troublesome with a lot of these open source projects is that it takes contributions from commercial companies to keep these projects moving and somehow the open source community treats them like dirt. Well...with top solaris engineers,like, Bonwick,etc.leaving Oacle. I think

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread ken mays
This is just my opinion, Sun could have survived under different circumstances, but you have very large billion dollar companies to compete. The little guy can only afford to make so many mistakes. Oracle, no matter the negativity, has the resources and clients to sustain a few big blows. A

[osol-discuss] ZFS Raidz2 problem, detached drive

2010-09-30 Thread andy cowling
I have an X4500 thumper box with 48x 500gb drives setup in a a pool and split into raidz2 sets of 8 - 10 drives within the single pool. I had a failed disk with i cfgadm unconfigured and replaced no problem, but it wasn't recognised as a Sun drive in Format and unbeknown to me someone else

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Edward Martinez
Oracle, no matter the negativity, has the resources and clients to sustain a few big blows. maybe not for long;-) many customers are beginning to smell vendor lock in from oracle from a mile away and are beginning to look else where. According to distrowatch: Openindiana is receiving more

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Octave Orgeron
As sad as it is to see people leave the Solaris Kernel development team, you have to remember that there are a lot of other engineers in that team. People always leave when there is an acquisition and it's hard to hold onto folks. I was sad with Richard McDougall left Sun for VMware. But

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
On 30 Sep 2010, at 02:44, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but the update 9 of Solaris 10 has finally switched to OpenOffice.org. Thus, it seems that Oracle also silently RIP'd StarOffice (actually the decision was already made during Sun's time).

[osol-discuss] C programming, invalid argc value

2010-09-30 Thread Saadia Fatima
Hi, Invalid argc value is passed to main, when I run the program with no cmmand line arguments main(argc = 134551360, argv=0x8047b2a) // from gdb How to fix this?? -Thanks SF -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] C programming, invalid argc value

2010-09-30 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Maybe something strange with gdb, or with the compiler? By convention, there is always supposed to be at least one argument, argv[0], which should be the same as the pathname or the last level of the pathname being executed (login shells typically get the last level of the pathname but prefixed

Re: [osol-discuss] C programming, invalid argc value

2010-09-30 Thread Edward Martinez
Hi, Invalid argc value is passed to main, when I run the program with no cmmand line arguments main(argc = 134551360, argv=0x8047b2a) // from gdb How to fix this?? -Thanks SF not a C guru;-) but i think main needs to be converted from string to an interger, something like this

Re: [osol-discuss] C programming, invalid argc value

2010-09-30 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
And for the curious, after adding a pause() following the printf() in atest.c, so I could use ps to see what a process with no argv[0] looked like: $ ps -o pid,fname -p 15789 PID COMMAND 15789 atest $ ps -o pid,comm -p 15789 PID COMMAND 15789 $ ps -o pid,args -p 15789 PID COMMAND 15789 $

Re: [osol-discuss] : - (

2010-09-30 Thread Gary Driggs
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:50 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: Further discussions on this subject will be moved to the Taiwan OpenSolaris Users Group. Speaking of which, who wants to pitch a Solaris port of Lotus Symphony Suite to IBM? It's developed in Beijing... -Gary