On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 06:23:36PM -0700, victor wrote:
> Quad core xeon 2.66ghz x5355 slower system?
Sorry, I did reread that after posting, that isn't really slow.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes
G'Day Victor,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:09:04PM -0700, victor wrote:
> Okay I got more information...
>
> I detached the second disk and starting benchmarking it. Here are the results.
>
> Write to zvol:
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zvol/rdsk/foo/ufs bs=1024k count=100
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB
G'Day Victor,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:09:04PM -0700, victor wrote:
> Okay I got more information...
>
> I detached the second disk and starting benchmarking it. Here are the results.
>
> Write to zvol:
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zvol/rdsk/foo/ufs bs=1024k count=100
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB
G'Day Victor,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:56:26AM -0700, victor wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion here are the results. I hate to scale it down to
> a 34 meg file, 128 megs took too long to write out. Compression is off.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ptime dd if=/dev/urandom of=foo bs=128k count=2
G'Day Victor,
Lets shuffle this thread over to perf-discuss (or zfs-discuss).
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:19:01AM -0700, victor wrote:
> Okay, no matter how hard I try I just can't get the disk speeds to be
> remotely reasonable on Indiana snv_91.
>
> Here are the stats on the box in question:
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:53:06AM -0700, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> How long uptime for Solaris and which version, have you heard of? Please be
> quite sure when you post, not something like "i heard a tale about a
> strangers cat whose neighbour had a solaris box in poland that had 5 years
> uptime
G'Day All,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:21:53PM +, John Rice wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to propose a Mozilla DTrace project for inclusion on
> Opensolaris.org. We'd like it to be an endorsed project of the DTrace,
> Desktop and Performance Communities.
>
> Initial Project Goals:
> 1. Design
+1
It would be great to see Java provide easy access to all the major sources of
statistics -- DTrace, kstat, SNMP and procfs (may need someone to write a
procfs interface - I haven't checked if one exists). In which case, one new
possibility would be to write a Java SymbEL interpreter to run S
G'Day Dennis,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> I have a system here that runs snv_38 and I have a bit of code that cranks a
> large pile of numbers about. All of this is integer operations with the
> exception of maybe two lines that require floating point. That would be two
> line
G'Day Folks,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> I've just gone through this thread.
So have I. I can see the difference between an Articles project and a
Documentation community, and so far I think it makes sense for them to be
seperate. Of course, we'll have a better idea once we hav
another OpenSolaris
contributer have been writing a game, but more on that later)...
cheers,
Brendan Gregg
[Sydney, Australia]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
G'Day Folks,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
[...]
> 3. /usr/dt/bin/dtksh should not be listed as workaround - this version
> of ksh93 is based on a alpha version of the Korn shell - which should
> have never been shipped with a production OS due too many bugs and
> problems according to
G'Day Folks,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
> Just been having a discussion with a memober of the community (you know
> who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who logged a bug, had it
> updated by a sun engineer, but now has a problem because of
G'Day Folks,
Are there any variants on the CDDL header that we can paste into code?
The only one I've seen is the one at the top of every OpenSolaris source
file. It's rather long and doesn't really explain itself as an open
source, royalty free license.
I've commented on the CDDL header below a
G'Day Raymond,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Raymond Scott wrote:
> I'll be trying this out
> We just went through a painful process of changing from another vendors
> LDAP directory product to Sun's directory. Part of the conversion meant
> watching who was still using the old directories and telling
15 matches
Mail list logo
