How about OpenOS ? ;)
On 3-8-2010 22:35, Florian Ermisch wrote:
well then, how about SUeNix? ;)
2010/8/3, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com:
Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
SolarOS
Rolls right off the tongue ;)
And anything that looks close enough to the name of an
Well, personally i would prefer if they all kept their work within
Oracle/Sun, but let's see what this Illumos project will be..
Interesting that they have people from Nexenta, and the site is hosted
within Stanford University Network...so back to home? ;)
Bruno
On 2-8-2010 21:43, Edward
Based on my experiences, VDI solutions are not good for any
graphics-intensive environment...
If you want esxi you will also need Vcenter and that's not free ;)
Bruno
On 17-7-2010 21:11, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Has anyone here used Oracle (formerly Sun) VDI in a SMB environment?
I'm
On 15-7-2010 11:27, Sean . wrote:
Was just reading this on the Register myself. This is not good news for the
future of Solaris at all never mind OpenSolaris.
With all my respect to the developer in question, i think we are going
way out of line here.
Despite all the value of a person a
On 15-7-2010 11:43, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dev Mazumdar d...@opensound.com wrote:
In other news.
Greg Lavender, the lead developer in charge of the Solaris operating system
at Oracle, has left the company
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/14/oracle_lavender_opensolaris/
On 15-7-2010 16:41, Alan Burlison wrote:
Despite repeated warnings, some people are continuing to badmouth each
other on this list. As explained previously, this is not acceptable.
We've been warning people who have overstepped the mark, from this
point on we won't be doing that, we'll just
On 14-7-2010 17:41, James Nelson wrote:
Just out of curiosity what firmware version do you have on the network card
from dell? It looks like people with the 4.x version are not experiencing
the errors, but 5.x people are.
do dmesg|grep bnx and look for the following line:
Jun 22 08:23:43
to think, this is a
production server that I don't want to muck with too much.
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Sousa [mailto:bso...@epinfante.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:19 AM
To: James Nelson
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris on DELL
On 28-6-2010 21:41, dd pn wrote:
Will be interesting to see benchmarks! :o)
For X4800 see,
http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/20100628_x4800_spec_cpu2006_rate
Let's hope this is just an omission , so far, but on the OS
compatibility list of all these new servers, Opensolaris doesn't
Maybe i'm not seeing the big picture, but i thought that the all ZFS
appliance line runned in some custom OpenSolaris, making OSOL a
revenue product.
But than again...what do i understand about business anyway...
Bruno
On 28-6-2010 21:52, John Plocher wrote:
In Oracle's mind, one is a
Hi,
Thanks to all that made this really nice howto.
BTW, after this procedure is it still possible to boot into snv_134
environment, i.e will the grub.conf be updated to have have snv_134 and
snv_142 boot entries?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 21-6-2010 8:15, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe, I
in Spanish, go to AOSUG web site
- HowTos section: http://www.aosug.com.ar/?q=node/40 .
Thanks to all!!!
Best regards,
HeCSa.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Bruno Sousa bso...@epinfante.com
mailto:bso...@epinfante.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to all that made this really nice howto.
BTW
Well, despite i agree with you to a certain degree don't you think you
are being a little bit unbalanced towards IBM tech?
Despite the fact that Linux does indeed lacks some things, it also
provides quite a huge amount of enterprise features but for a fraction
of the price of AIX.
It's like
Hi all,
I have faced yet another kernel panic that seems to be related to mpt
driver.
This time i was trying to add a new disk to a running system (snv_134)
and this new disk was not being detected...following a tip i ran the
lsitool to reset the bus and this lead to a system panic.
MPT driver :
Hi all,Yet another story regarding mpt issues, and in order to make a
longstory short everytime that a Dell R710 running snv_134 logs the
information
scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning]
WARNING:/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@4/pci1028,1...@0 (mpt0): , the system
freezes andony a hard-reset fixes the issue.
already have the fix. I suspect
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 can be closed
as a dup of
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6875273
unless you see it again post snv_133.
Regards,
Brian
Bruno Sousa wrote:
Hi Brian,
First off all let me
help would be highly valuable.
Thanks in advance,
Bruno Sousa
The significant messages are :
Apr 13 11:12:04 san01 savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic:
Freeing a free IOMMU page: paddr=0xccca2000
Apr 13 11:12:04 san01 savecore: [ID 385089 auth.error] Saving compressed system
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 16:50, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
George Koutras wrote:
the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from
The question wasn't very clear, so here are my apologies.
I was trying to ask if Oracle/Sun will maintain 2 different filesystems
, ZFS and btrfs in two different platforms Open/Solaris and Linux, or if
something can be merged along the way...
I can imagine alot of customers with running linux
Bruno Sousa wrote:
Hi all,
Recently one of the servers that my company uses , a Dell R710, attached to
2 Sun JBOD J4400 started to crash quite often.
Finally i got a message in /var/adm/messages that might point to something
usefull, but i don't have the expertise to start
20 matches
Mail list logo
