Did you try bigadmin?
-Original Message-
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tan
Loc Pham
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 6:11 AM
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [osol-discuss] Solaris Zone
So if one of the disks goes south you dont send the system off into
the weeds because /tmp is blown up, backing store for stacks/heap/other
anon disappear, etc. Spanning swap across two spindles instead of
mirroring swap on an erstwhile HA system just introduces two single
points of failure.
However, many of the 4M binaries also dynamically link with many
libraries which individually are also 4M. But in the in the aggregate
they are 4M and thrash the 512x8K itlb beyond recognition. I did a
little experiment with this (posted on performance:discuss) wherein I
took such an app and a
McDaniel (damcdani)
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Obscure umem semantics
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:46:40PM -0700, David McDaniel wrote:
This might be better suited to another board, but if so I dont know
which one. In any case the dialog might be valuable
Its really none of my business, but it seems to me you should at least
consider attaching an OpenSolaris presence to some of the traditional
telecom shows where Sun is often present in other guises, like
Supercomm. This might be an opportunity to to win back some otherwise
eroding mindshare to
