Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris Companion community development

2005-08-18 Thread Laszlo Peter
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 11:20, Joerg Schilling wrote: What we need is an infrastructure for a build system. Neither Sunfreeware not Blastwave has this as they both supply only binaries. Having a buld system that deals with fetching the original soruces (or at least documenting the URL),

Re: [osol-discuss] Getting software into OpenSolaris (was: Interface Stability... (was process))

2005-07-27 Thread Laszlo Peter
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:52, Joerg Schilling wrote: Fetching the JDS sources was a nightmare (I hat to do approx. 300 mouse clicks). I asume that unpacking the sources will take a whole day ad the sources are in pkgadd format. Hmm... sorry for that... The idea was that people won't

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Why I do think OpenSolaris ought to work with Debian (fwd)

2005-07-25 Thread Laszlo Peter
Hi Rod, Thanks for the detailed response. Of course I agree that it's better to avoid the problem by carefully controlling public interface changes. However more and more software in Solaris comes from external sources and while we can work with community maintainers and try and make sure they

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Why I do think OpenSolaris ought to work with Debian

2005-07-20 Thread Laszlo Peter
Hi John, On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 19:31, John Plocher wrote: Without this ability to manage the evolution of shared components, it becomes extremely difficult to reuse them, because asynchronous development almost guarantees that a change to the shared component will break a consumer, and that

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris distributions and package managment

2005-06-29 Thread Laszlo Peter
I feel like it's time to mention my baby: pkgbuild (pkgbuild.sf.net), which is an rpmbuild replacement that produces Solaris SVr4 packages. This is what we use for building JDS/Solaris (all GNOME, Mozilla, Evolution, APOC). We have rpm spec files [with a few enhancements], patches and community