part of myself) of
> GNU Solaris as to which of these branches that should be emphasized. It's
> not like we have 1000 developers just sitting around and waiting for more
> work to be done, so a bit of focus (with the clear allowance of letting
> people with different opinions "
compability?)
Michael
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:07 PM, David Bartley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Michael Casadevall
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The kFreeBSD port has had a lot of considerable issues with porting
>> software. Reme
r ON
> merges which will unavoidably lead to higher rate of errors/bugs.
>
> But because GNU/kFreeBSD exists, I do not see why GNU/kOpenSolaris can't
> be...
>
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:27 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debian's main issue is that parts of Sun's libc are not open (mostly
libc_i18n; they require all bits to be open). Having seen the issues
kFreeBSD has had with using glibc with their kernel, I'm not sure if
its work having a ksolaris port since configu
