Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Why I do think OpenSolaris ought to work with Debian

2005-07-23 Thread Nathan Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shawn Walker wrote: > Forgive me if it seems that way, but I have spent a great deal of time > reading through responses given by the Debian project and have seen > time and time again the numerous restrictions they place on software. > They have rejec

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Why I do think OpenSolaris ought to work with Debian

2005-07-25 Thread Nathan Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Schilling wrote: > Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Is anyone seriously concerned that Sun or the FSF might sue over linking >>a GPL program against a CDDL library? Have they sued over the inclusio

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: GPL & CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-09-06 Thread Nathan Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I see no reason for this conversation to continue, ad nauseum, > for the remainder of eternity. OpenSolaris is under CDDL. > GPL is incompatible with any license that is not a sublicensable > subset of GPL. That wasn't by acc

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: GPL & CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-09-07 Thread Nathan Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>Provide you don't ship them as part of your OS. This was already the case >>>with >>>gcc on Solaris. >> >>Define "ship as part of the OS"; gcc and other GPL'ed