[osol-discuss] Re: Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2006-05-28 Thread Tatjana S Heuser
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: Then the alternative is for SUN to get 10 engineers, and get them to work on an existing opensource project to bring it up to standard or create an in house version based off licencing specifications. I'm very much in favour of this solution - like many others who just

[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal - Simplified Solaris Device Naming (a.k.a Devname)

2006-05-26 Thread Tatjana S Heuser
Quoting P.Tribble: I see no advantage whatsoever to hiding important information. What benefit can possibly accrue from this? Cluster ? Grid Engine ? -- Tatjana This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] Re: Why LSB filesystem layout is bad,part 1 ...

2006-04-01 Thread Tatjana S Heuser
Martin Man wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: My personal complaint is that they stuff everything into /usr/bin/. Unix had some kind of namespace support via the elements in ${PATH} so having package groups seperated into /usr/dt/bin/ (CDE), /usr/kde3/bin (KDE3), /usr/xpg4/bin/ (XPG4 personality)