)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:02 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] NFS version on Solaris 10
Vamsee Priya wrote:
> I have NFS v2, v3 and v4 on my Solaris machine which has Sola
?
Thanks
Vamsee Priya
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi All,
Is there any command/system call to find the load on each core of a CPU?
If yes, please let me know.
Thanks
Priya
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vamsee Priya; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Scheduling algorithm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have a query about scheduling in multi core systems. The u
Hi ,
I have a query about scheduling in multi core systems. The user level
threads are mapped to LWP in Solaris and those LWPs are scheduled by the
OS.
Is there any flexibility for the user to write some module and plug into
the kernel so that he can schedule all the LWPs (to which his threads
Thanks a lot ..
Will try to look as to what could be the problem.
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:51 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Panic with
Hi All,
I have a kernel module which panics at 2 different places with the
following pani message :
trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss)
When does this kind of a trap occur actually?
Thanks in advance
Priya
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
Hi All,
We have a kernel module called IPFS which lies in between VFS and UFS.
We are getting a kernel panic (with the following stack trace) very
frequently on ATCA blades where as the panic is almost rare on CPCI
blades.
sfmmu_tsbmiss_exception+0x54(2a1038555a0, 42001, 31, 0, d5b28,
6001e
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vamsee
Priya
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss]
SIGSEGVinlibc.so.1`_malloc_unlockedonSolarisx86machine
Hi all,
I could find out the reason for my earlier
, January 03, 2008 3:06 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV
inlibc.so.1`_malloc_unlockedonSolarisx86machine
Try to run this on OpenSolaris, not on something older.
The advantages are:
- the failure mode below
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:48 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in
libc
, 2007 6:52 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in
libc.so.1`_malloc_unlockedonSolarisx86machine
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> From the umem_status I too agree that some thing in my progr
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 6:36 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked
onSolarisx86machine
>This is th
;free+0x14
ipfs_diff.exe'meta_free+0xbf
ipfs_diff.exe'active_out+0x44e
ipfs_diff.exe'active+0xe0
ipfs_diff.exe'main+0xd59
ipfs_diff.exe'_start+0x80
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 5:59 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked
onSolarisx86 machine
>Hi
>Apart from the scenario I exp
Vamsee
Priya
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked
onSolarisx86 machine
Hi All,
Thanks a lot for the responses. I used libumem to find out where
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vamsee Priya; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked on
Solarisx86 machine
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTE
have a
Sun studio compiler to run dbx.
Any more tools with which I can debug futher?
Thanks
Priya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 2:27 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.o
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 11:33 AM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked
onSolaris x86 machine
Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Hi All
>
> When I use my 32 bit binary on Solaris x86 ma
Hi All
When I use my 32 bit binary on Solaris x86 machine, I get a segmentation
fault with the following stack trace.
libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked+0x14c(4000, 3, 80a3130, 1, 8046a38, 805763f)
libc.so.1`malloc+0x39(4000, 0, 8046a1c, fef9e455, fef9158c, 4)
meta_del+0x13(2, 80a3100, 10, 0)
standby_fix
Hi
I am trying to port a kernel module (which acts as a layer between VFS
and UFS) from Solaris sparc platform to Solaris x86 platform.
I am facing many kernel panics happening at different places.
Some times things work fine without panics. This confirms me that there
is no problem with the
ion of the
alternate boot environment so that I could check that and copy the
correct file. ( all this happens before luactivate and init 6. so we
won't have the upgraded info with uname -r)
Thanks
Vamsee Priya
-Original Message-
From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesd
: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:41 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Finding upgraded OS version after doing
aLiveupGrade
Vamsee Priya wrote:
> Vamsee Priya wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> After a live upgrade on Solaris, `unam
-
From: Ian Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:27 PM
To: Vamsee Priya
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Finding upgraded OS version after doing a
LiveupGrade
Vamsee Priya wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> After a live upgrade on Sol
Hi
After a live upgrade on Solaris, `uname -r` gives the older OS version.
I need to find the new upgraded OS version after a live upgrade. Can you
suggest the places where I can find it?
Thanks
Priya
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opens
25 matches
Mail list logo
