On 23/01/2010 07:25, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Yea, however with another ugly bug for zones, one for X (but at least with
workaround) and old X bug from 130 is still there.
And only 2(!) new packages. It will be fine to know how much important it is to
use this page
Have you tried
$ pfexec virt-manager
Though vir-manager does have a python related bug in 131,
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
-Ghee
On 23/01/2010 15:42, Bruno Damour wrote:
1. When I start virt-manager from the menu, when logged as the primary
administrator (first
On 25/01/2010 11:02, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
quote
osol-131 is in pkg.opensolaris.org/dev are packages that are supported
by Sun through her internal QA etc. So the quality are much better that
that from of pkgfactory.o.o.
/quote
It's just theory which doesn't look to be true regarding quality of
David J. Orman wrote:
On May 30, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Feel the love.
-Shawn
And with that fine message from Shawn, I'd like to propose an end of
thread. This conversation isn't productive, scares the living crap out
of me each time I start writing
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
Well, lets assume we go free software and free love - someone has to
create this software - and with 5000 employees given the sack at Sun,
wouldn't of it been bettter to direct those 5000 (lets assume 1,000 were
programmers) or so to put together a decent Adobe
Welcome to OpenSolaris.
OpenSolaris supports both Sparc and x86/x64 is the short answer to you
specifc question:)
-Ghee
Chad McCullough wrote:
hello,
my hosting company, textdrive, is moving from FreeBSD to Solaris. now, my first reaction, admittedly, was, NO!. at first, it was
Mika Borner wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/06 2:31 pm
To make Solaris more attractive compared to Linux (et al.) we should
dump the whole X-Window System.
Let hope I am not taking you out of context on this quote, go talk to
any Linux desktop guys and asked them to
