Hello Sarah,
Friday, April 28, 2006, 11:52:24 PM, you wrote:
SJ Hi Daniel,
SJ I am the developer who did the work for this feature. We originally had
SJ a force flag planned for all the utilities that were modified to enable
SJ in use checking. However, the force flag was an area of much debate
Sarah Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am the developer who did the work for this feature. We originally had
a force flag planned for all the utilities that were modified to enable
in use checking. However, the force flag was an area of much debate and
in the end we removed it. We
Hi Daniel,
I am the developer who did the work for this feature. We originally had
a force flag planned for all the utilities that were modified to enable
in use checking. However, the force flag was an area of much debate and
in the end we removed it. We recognize this is a potential issue
One other thing... use utility/other for cat/subcat and please add me to
interest list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks,
sarah
Daniel Rock wrote:
Hi,
this week I gave snv_36 a try (hadn't upgraded for a long time) - and
this new feature (put in double quotes) was getting me in rage:
6194015
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 18:05, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
partition la
Cannot label disk when partitions are in use as described.
I do not think a -force flag is appropriate.
instead, we should improve the granularity of the in-use detection --
fix format so it lets
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 19:40, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
The heuristic of the vfstab being 'in use' could be improved upon
however, which I believe is Daniel's main concern. The idea is that
entries in /etc/vfstab are possibly in use, and designed to help users
not step on filesystems that may
Sarah Jelinek schrieb:
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
It does allow you to change the sizes of partitions which are not in
use, as long as they don't overlap in use partitions. It even lets you
grow in use partitions.
The heuristic of the vfstab being 'in use' could be improved upon
however, which
