Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:13:25 PST "W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > o reiterate, I'm not asserting that Solaris is a bad > > OS. If I > > thought so, I wouldn't be here. But there is a big > > difference between > > good and "most" secure. Unless you can back this > > assertion up w

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

> o reiterate, I'm not asserting that Solaris is a bad > OS. If I > thought so, I wouldn't be here. But there is a big > difference between > good and "most" secure. Unless you can back this > assertion up with > concrete evidence of such then you should cease > making making it, > as up to this

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:56:20 PST "W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Constant repetition of this mantra does not make it > > so. All you have > > to do is search . I'm > > not saying > > Solaris is bad, but just that it's not #1 when it > > comes to sec

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

> Constant repetition of this mantra does not make it > so. All you have > to do is search . I'm > not saying > Solaris is bad, but just that it's not #1 when it > comes to security, as > some on this list seem to repeatedly assert. > > > -- > Best regards, > >

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:50:13 PST "W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press > > release here. > > > > I think it is an insult to Virtual Box (and the > > reader) to imply that Virtual Box magically popped [snip] VM. The fact that, as

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

> I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press > release here. > > I think it is an insult to Virtual Box (and the > reader) to imply that Virtual Box magically popped > into existence when Sun bought it. It has been "on > the scene" for some time now... > > And I'm not sure what "mor

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide > >> more and better ways to connect OpenSolaris to other environments. > > > >I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press release here. > > > I think you are missing the important

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

>> With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide >> more and better ways to connect OpenSolaris to other environments. > >I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press release here. I think you are missing the important part that Virtual Box allows OpenSolari

Re: [osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with

> With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide > more and better ways to connect OpenSolaris to other environments. I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press release here. I think it is an insult to Virtual Box (and the reader) to imply that Virtual Box

[osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with OpenSolaris Governance! Tonight! 02/28

REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER This month we have a very special meeting which brings Tim Marsland and Todd Clayton are back at SVOSUG giving an update on Virtualization. With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide more and better ways to

[osol-discuss] [SVOSUG] Update on Virtualization along with OpenSolaris Governance! 02/28

This month we have a very special meeting which brings Tim Marsland and Todd Clayton are back at SVOSUG giving an update on Virtualization. With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide more and better ways to connect OpenSolaris to other environments. This is a very exc