Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-11-05 Thread James Andrewartha
Ginn Chen wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:02 PM, James Andrewartha wrote: > >> Ginn Chen wrote: >>> I believe Firefox 3 doesn't have this bug since it's using its own >>> sqlite3 library. >> >> Does it suffer from the fsync bug that the Linux versions have? > > I guess not. > > First, the probl

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-11-03 Thread Ginn Chen
On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:02 PM, James Andrewartha wrote: > Ginn Chen wrote: >> I believe Firefox 3 doesn't have this bug since it's using its own >> sqlite3 library. > > Does it suffer from the fsync bug that the Linux versions have? I guess not. First, the problem is reported for ext3 file system.

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-11-03 Thread James Andrewartha
Ginn Chen wrote: > I believe Firefox 3 doesn't have this bug since it's using its own > sqlite3 library. Does it suffer from the fsync bug that the Linux versions have? -- James Andrewartha ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@ope

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-11-02 Thread Ginn Chen
I believe Firefox 3 doesn't have this bug since it's using its own sqlite3 library. >> 6755391 sqlite3 should not be built with SQLITE_DEBUG; uses >> access(2) too often, slows things down Ginn On Nov 1, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Harry Lu wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 0

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Harry Lu
Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:13:46PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: > >> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen >> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its >> predecessor. >> > > See: > > 6755391 sqlite3 should not be bui