[ Removed opensolaris-discuss from the Cc and Bcc'ed advocacy-discuss
and opensolaris-discuss. Folks, can we try to exercise some basic
email etiquette here? ]
Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
Jörg
It's the shell /usr/sh points to. This satisfies backward compatibility
so you're
Hey,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
My fault for not figuring
Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
Jörg
It's the shell /usr/sh points
Joerg Schilling wrote:
BTW: I vote against allowing to replace /sbin/sh by something different than
a
100% compatible Bourne shell for distributions that like to use the
OpenSolaris
trademark.
Discussions of what properties distros must have to use the OpenSolaris
trademark are being
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
/usr/has/bin/sh
...since it is a hasbin :)
Groan!
korny
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brian
Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
scripts to demonstrate these incompatibilities really exist.
The three users in
[ Bcc'ing advocacy-discuss and opensolaris-discuss to reduce cross-posting ]
Peter,
It would help a lot if the aims of this project were clearly explained
and enunciated, because I for one haven't a clue what they are, and
the more I think about it and look at what has been announced and
On Feb 13, 2008 3:12 PM, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian
Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
scripts to
