David Abrahams wrote:
on Fri May 22 2009, Shawn Walker
wrote:
pfexec pkg image-update
osol n00b here ---
I just did a fresh 0906 install and followed these instructions:
pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev opensolaris.org
pfexec pkg image-update
and to my surpr
David Abrahams wrote:
on Wed May 27 2009, Shawn Walker
wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
on Fri May 22 2009, Shawn Walker
wrote:
pfexec pkg image-update
osol n00b here ---
I just did a fresh 0906 install and followed these instructions:
pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.o
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed May 27 2009, Shawn Walker
> wrote:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Fri May 22 2009, Shawn Walker
>> wrote:
pfexec pkg image-update
>>> osol n00b here ---
>>>
>>> I just did a fresh 0906 install and followed these instructions:
>>>
>>> pfexec pkg set-publi
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
What does uname -a report on your system. If it's something like:
SunOS shire 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
in particular the snv_111b part, then you're precisely where you're
expected to be. The /dev repository is 'frozen' at build 111b in
preparation for being
> No, the public pkg.opensolaris.org/dev repository has not been updated since
> 111a :)
>
> 111b was never published there (intentionally).
We know. But why?
Regards,
--
%martin
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>>
>>> No, the public pkg.opensolaris.org/dev repository has not been updated
>>> since
>>> 111a :)
>>>
>>> 111b was never published there (intentionally).
>>>
>>
>>
>> We know. But why?
>>
>
> Because further user te
* Shawn Walker (swal...@opensolaris.org) wrote:
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>> What does uname -a report on your system. If it's something like:
>>
>> SunOS shire 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
>>
>> in particular the snv_111b part, then you're precisely where you're
>> expected to be. The /de
Martin Bochnig wrote:
No, the public pkg.opensolaris.org/dev repository has not been updated since
111a :)
111b was never published there (intentionally).
We know. But why?
Because 2009.06 is scheduled to be released during C1.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
__
Martin Bochnig wrote:
No, the public pkg.opensolaris.org/dev repository has not been updated since
111a :)
111b was never published there (intentionally).
We know. But why?
Because further user testing could identify bugs, and it's time to ship?
(said tongue-in-cheek...)
- Matt
afaik, changes are only minimal, i.e. adding one driver and removing a
few files.
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8626
to OP: Just a warning. If you did a fresh install of b111a you might
run into some problems, when updates are available.
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_
10 matches
Mail list logo
