John Plocher wrote:
So, +1, except that your 2 week deadline may need to be something like
in a month; most certainly before the end of the calendar year.
As I said earlier, the 2 weeks was just a proposal, I'm happy to go with
whatever the community feels is appropriate. However your
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 15:13 +, Simon Phipps wrote:
That's a clear, concrete proposal for how we can move forward.
Sounds a device calculated to lead to an early no vote to me -
In the absence of a policy, it's premature for sun to continue
distributing something calling itself the
Alan Burlison wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I agree two weeks seems arbitrarily short, but given the timelines,
think that December/January-ish is about as late as we can push it
unless Indiana agrees to choose another name for it's March release.
My post was a proposal, a stake in the
