Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] We aren't an Open Community, because we don't control our Trademark and Website. (And it's not Sun's fault).

2008-02-14 Thread Shawn Walker
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:40 PM, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seriously now... even I think this is getting silly, and I'm young and > foolish. A couple dozen people forking O/N?come now... > > Al Hopper's right. The OGB was spineless, Sun was aggressive and > ignored the comm

Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] We aren't an Open Community, because we don't control our Trademark and Website. (And it's not Sun's fault).

2008-02-13 Thread Stephen Lau
Hi John, See it as you will, but to accuse the OGB of being spineless is a bit... well unfounded and accusatory. FWIW, several OGB members were and continue to be vocally opposed to Sun's decision (myself being one of them), but when it boils down to it, it's Sun's decision for better or for

Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] We aren't an Open Community, because we don't control our Trademark and Website. (And it's not Sun's fault).

2008-02-13 Thread John Sonnenschein
Seriously now... even I think this is getting silly, and I'm young and foolish. A couple dozen people forking O/N?come now... Al Hopper's right. The OGB was spineless, Sun was aggressive and ignored the community. They'll do whatever they're going to do quite aside from how we feel about it