Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-25 Thread Bruce
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:09:24 -0800, Jürgen Keil wrote: 2) WARNING: Mobile 4 Series chipset present, activating quirks Message Seen at 124/128/129/130 Suggested work around is not usefull as it affects the use of Vbox. 3) Not powering off properly. Seen at 124/128/129 When powered

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-25 Thread Bruce
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:47:20 -0800, Vikram Hegde wrote: Hi, I can confirm that all three of these problems will be fixed in build 133. I have a new version of the IOMMU driver that fixes all of these problems on a Toshiba R600 I'm starting to feel left behind :-( May have another go at

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-24 Thread Jürgen Keil
2) WARNING: Mobile 4 Series chipset present, activating quirks Message Seen at 124/128/129/130 Suggested work around is not usefull as it affects the use of Vbox. 3) Not powering off properly. Seen at 124/128/129 When powered off/down , activity lights stay active. 4) suspend.resume

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-24 Thread Vikram Hegde
Hi, I can confirm that all three of these problems will be fixed in build 133. I have a new version of the IOMMU driver that fixes all of these problems on a Toshiba R600 Note that a suspend/resume followed later by a fast reboot do not work (fast reboot hangs) This is a fast reboot problem

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-23 Thread Brian Cameron
Tim: On 01/23/10 01:56, Tim Scanlon wrote: comay said; 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white This is probably tied to X 3d feature stuff, I encountered the same problem was able to trigger the white screen of doom when I tested to see if I could do something more

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-23 Thread Tim Scanlon
yippi wrote: The new GDM 2.28 was integrated into build 130. This replaces the old GDM 2.20 which was in previous builds. The new GDM is a complete rewrite of the code, and does not yet support a graphical configuration program like gdmsetup. One is in the works, and should be available in the

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:31:04 -0500, John Martin wrote: On 01/21/10 05:01 PM, Bruce wrote: I have a different DVD. hmmm, votes for I pull the DVD from the chassis and watch the results ? :-) I would also check the SBIOS settings for hardware virtualization (Virtualization

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce - sdf
On 21/01/2010 20:31, John Martin wrote: On 01/21/10 03:12 PM, Bruce wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login A cold boot test on my M10 running b130: 10:20:40 power on 10:20:52 grub menu first appears 10:21:23

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:38:55 +, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:31:04 -0500, John Martin wrote: On 01/21/10 05:01 PM, Bruce wrote: I have a different DVD. hmmm, votes for I pull the DVD from the chassis and watch the results ? :-) I would also check the SBIOS settings for

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-22 Thread John Martin
On 01/22/10 08:36 AM, Bruce wrote: Does anyone know if there is a bug for this already or do I have to speend time searching ? For VTx enabled on M10, there are at least two bugs: // S/R http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6870290 // power-off

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-22 Thread Tim Scanlon
comay said; 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white This is probably tied to X 3d feature stuff, I encountered the same problem was able to trigger the white screen of doom when I tested to see if I could do something more lively with my GeForce 9500 GT than the 'none'

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Bruce
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:40:55 -0800, David.Comay-UdXhSnd/wVw wrote: 129: Xen manager did not even start 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a. Although I believe both of these issues have been resolved,

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Ruthven - Sun UK
Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login I seem to recall a similar increase in build time, and a FW update of the DVD drive (of all things!) sorted it out. It seems that the relevant driver (I don't recall offhand) was timing

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Ruthven - Sun UK
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login I seem to recall a similar increase in build time, sorry - I mean boot time. Fingers working faster than brain... and a FW update of the DVD drive (of

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread John Martin
On 01/21/10 05:20 AM, Bruce wrote: Is the M10 going to be the continued supported/sold platform (ok US only I know, but I chose it because of the fact it could be obtained with openSol and is a pretty good box). The Tecra M10 is a supported platform. Your list of problems is puzzling

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread John Martin
On 01/21/10 10:03 AM, Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login A cold boot test on my M10 running b130: 10:20:40 power on 10:20:52 grub menu first appears 10:21:23 OSOL boot begins 10:22:24

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Anon Y Mous
[*] I do see a S/R problem if virtualization hardware support is enabled in the SBIOS, but this is not the default setting. Yes, but I would think that one of the main reasons for buying a Toshiba laptop with OpenSolaris pre-installed is to run a software stack that draws heavily from Sun's

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread John Martin
On 01/21/10 12:14 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote: [*] I do see a S/R problem if virtualization hardware support is enabled in the SBIOS, but this is not the default setting. Yes, but I would think that one of the main reasons for buying a Toshiba laptop with OpenSolaris pre-installed is to run a

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Bruce
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:03:28 +, Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login I seem to recall a similar increase in build time, and a FW update of the DVD drive (of all things!) sorted it out.

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread John Martin
On 01/21/10 03:12 PM, Bruce wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login A cold boot test on my M10 running b130: 10:20:40 power on 10:20:52 grub menu first appears 10:21:23 OSOL boot begins 10:22:24 login

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login If anyone wants to point me to bugs, and if I can add myself I will. Well, there's this: Bug 13946 - Solaris Boot time needs to be looked at more seriously now.

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Bruce
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:11:50 +, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:03:28 +, Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login I seem to recall a similar increase in build time, and a FW update

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Bruce
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:31:24 -0500, John Martin wrote: On 01/21/10 03:12 PM, Bruce wrote: Bruce wrote: 1) Progressivly longer boot times snv_111b 2.5 mins to login snv_128 4.5 mins to login A cold boot test on my M10 running b130: 10:20:40 power on 10:20:52 grub menu first

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread John Martin
On 01/21/10 05:01 PM, Bruce wrote: I have a different DVD. hmmm, votes for I pull the DVD from the chassis and watch the results ? :-) I would also check the SBIOS settings for hardware virtualization (Virtualization Technology on page 1 - disabled on my M10) and Device Config on

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-21 Thread Anon Y Mous
If anyone wants to point me to bugs, and if I can add myself I will. How about this one where the scroll bars get corrupted in 2009.06 when you open up an Adobe Acrobat file with a lot of pages in it: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=121969tstart=0 Anybody know if a bug

[osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Mauro Mozzarelli
129: Xen manager did not even start 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread John Martin
On 01/13/10 07:40 AM, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white Which graphics? If NVIDIA and you had previously manually enabled compiz, try the workaround in: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6912450

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Ian Collins
Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: 129: Xen manager did not even start Odd, my xVM server is running b129. 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white Odd, my desktop is running b130! -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread David . Comay
129: Xen manager did not even start 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a. Although I believe both of these issues have been resolved, did you examine http://defect.opensolaris.org and/or