Hahahaha! Yes, you are right, you did not say so. I dont really know why I
posted that. I must have switched on the autopilot. There have been lots of FUD
around OpenSolaris recently. Sorry for that. ;o)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> I dont see that "Oracle is killing OpenSolaris"
I never said it was
> Hence, OpenSolaris code will
> not be killed. It is only FUD to say so.
I didn't say so
> Ergo, OpenSolaris will not be killed.
I didn't say it would
> Again, OpenSolaris will not be killed.
Again, I didn't say it would
As a follow-on:
So, as it's written on the hcts page, all Systems on the hcl are also possibly
certified for OSOL!
See:
Compatibility testing under this program, audit of test results and acceptance
of the terms of a certification agreement are criteria for Oracle to list third
party systems
>From how I read the Premier Support for Operating Systems on non-Sun/Oracle
>hardware page, all you need to do to be allowed to buy support for ANY 3rd
>party system is:
Follow what's written at:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/index.jsp
Am I wrong?
Matthias
Von meinem iPhone gesend
> here he is as usual on time;)
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/29/oracle_hp_dell
> _solaris/
i think mr. morgan just bite the FUD before. possibly, no real confirmation
especially on oracle side because "as usual, they'll be stonewalled again".
but wow! he was on time redeeming himsel
On 07/30/10 04:27 PM, Norbert P. Copones wrote:
now... where is mr. morgan of theregister? he just said oracle spikes hp oem
contract. hope the contract spiking fud ends here.
To be fair to TPM, he did a follow-up story
referencing his original "spikes" story:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2
> now... where is mr. morgan of theregister? he just
> said oracle spikes hp oem contract. hope the contract
> spiking fud ends here.
here he is as usual on time;)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/29/oracle_hp_dell_solaris/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
now... where is mr. morgan of theregister? he just said oracle spikes hp oem
contract. hope the contract spiking fud ends here.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Fri, 7/30/10, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/solaris/non-sun-x86-081976.html
>
> there is a very clear hint:
>
> BENEFITS
>
>
>
> * World-class
> Oracle Solaris suppo
If you all go to:
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/solaris/non-sun-x86-081976.html
there is a very clear hint:
BENEFITS
* World-class Oracle Solaris support on any certified x86 system on
the
I dont see that "Oracle is killing OpenSolaris", if it is mentioned on the
official web page?
First of all, OpenSolaris is the basis for next gen Solaris 11. If OpenSolaris
code is scrapped, there will be no Solaris 11. Hence, OpenSolaris code will not
be killed. It is only FUD to say so.
On
> > Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> >
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
>
> > olaris/overview/index.html
>
> Not much of a mention - just says "please go to
> OpenSolaris.com" on every tab. Interesting to see
> that there is a community tab, which also points to
> openso
> > Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> >
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
>
> > olaris/overview/index.html
>
> Not much of a mention - just says "please go to
> OpenSolaris.com" on every tab. Interesting to see
> that there is a community tab, which also points to
> openso
> Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
> olaris/overview/index.html
Not much of a mention - just says "please go to OpenSolaris.com" on every tab.
Interesting to see that there is a community tab, which also points to
opensolaris.COM
--
This
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:25 +0100, Alan Burlison
> wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
> >
>
> FYI...
>
> http://blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-do
> es_sparc_have_future
> http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-
> the-future-of-
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:25 +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> FYI:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
>
FYI...
http://blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-does_sparc_have_future
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-the-future-of-SPARC.html
Paul
> Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
> olaris/overview/index.html
Well...looks like Oracle has launched their "Oracle Launches Oracle + Sun
Product Strategy Event Series" show to clarify stuff. they might mention
Oracle's strategy for Opens
Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opensolaris/overview/index.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> FYI:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
>
> --
> Alan Burlison
Good to see some clarity on one of the areas that earlier seemed murky.
More of the same, regarding OpenSolaris (the distro) would be helpful.
The alleged removal of the servers for the postgres folks' build far
FYI:
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
