Re: [osol-discuss] How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-27 Thread Brian Cameron
John: How is this ARC review process going to work with the community? I think it will become burdened if the core values of interface stability are not shared with the Free/Open Software community. In order to go through an interface review, the following information is necessary: +

Re: [osol-discuss] How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can imagine two different proposals coming out of this discussion: A) We should develop an extension to ksh93 that allows it to be used as a Stable replacement for ksh88 in places where backwards compatibility is required (i.e,

Re: [osol-discuss] How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93? Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris Express 7/2005 Released

2005-07-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to specify comment in /etc/driver_aliases? According to the source, # can be used for comments in /etc/driver_aliases But it's unlikely that the # comments will stick with the entries they're meant to comment.

[osol-discuss] How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-25 Thread John Plocher
Keith and Roy's conversation about ksh... Keep in mind the traditional Sun/Solaris development model that we are trying to seed our community with: Germinate an idea into a plan, Commit to that plan from both resource and technical perspectives (do we _want_ to