Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. I believe that the correct notice
is at
Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. I believe that
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
Ah, I see. The table has a License column, and it says OBL for all
the binaries. That's a bug. Even the binary-only tarball (which by
definition shouldn't have any GPL code) has a couple files that are
covered by third-party licenses.
Thanks for
stevel == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stevel That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others. I'll
stevel update that... thanks.
Okay, great. I won't file a bug, then. :-)
mike
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check this:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
it is obvious from the list that the files from the lower half are
completely
under the OBL.
That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others. I'll update
that...
Joerg Schilling wrote On 08/21/06 12:40,:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check this:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
it is obvious from the list that the files from the lower half are completely
under the OBL.
That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others.
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
They are not saying CDDL is illegal,
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Though as noted earlier, I agree this dispute is much more about cdrtools
than about CDDL in general.]
I noted alredy several times that this dispute is not limited to cdrtools.
Star has been attacked at the same time as cdrtools.
Jörg
--
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 11, 2006 10:51 PM
Josh Hurst wrote:
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
This is a Debian decision, and only vaguely, at best, relates to us.
Might I suggest
Josh Hurst wrote:
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
They are not saying CDDL is illegal, they are saying CDDL licensed
software does not
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
I think you're overstating -- the stuff you quoted was all about
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are not saying CDDL is illegal, they are saying CDDL licensed
software does not meet the GPL requirements for being included in
a GPL licensed program.They haven't said a fully CDDL program
by itself is a problem - it's mixing CDDL GPL into
Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun distributes current cdrtools with the license mixture intact (see
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/cmd/cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/).
Presumably Sun legal has blessed that and this isn't an OpenSolaris issue
at all
Sun is not the
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
1. That isn't what the message below says at all. It refers only
16 matches
Mail list logo
