Eric Lowe writes:
And while you're at it, would you create a Nevada project which is
sponsored by the ON community? Or is everyone content with the current
structure as-is?
I have at least one point of confusion about this plan. I suspect
it's probably something that someone has discussed
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
Thanks,
Danek
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
+1
--
-Alan
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
+1
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
Thanks,
Danek
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
When I first heard about ON, it sounded like a strange
acronym. Where's 'OFF'?
(So the best here is to say for me is ±0?)
Jan Engelhardt
-- ___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
When I first heard about ON, it sounded like a strange
acronym. Where's 'OFF'?
(So the best here is to say for me is ?0?)
If there's a strong desire to make
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the onnv community to be the on
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
+1
And while you're at it,
