Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
Thanks to whomever made that happen.
Oh, I see one of the big sources of delay. Its good to see the branding
process is going well.
r...@aequitas:/root# uname -a
SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_138 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
r...@aequita
>
>Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
>
>Thanks to whomever made that happen.
>
>Oh, I see one of the big sources of delay. Its good to see the branding
>process is going well.
>
>r...@aequitas:/root# uname -a
>SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_138 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
>
>
>>
>>Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
>>
>>Thanks to whomever made that happen.
>>
>>Oh, I see one of the big sources of delay. Its good to see the branding
>>process is going well.
>>
>>r...@aequitas:/root# uname -a
>>SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_138 i86pc i386 i86p
Hit escape on startup or check your /var/adm/messages line for:
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_138 64-bit
Copyright (c) 1983, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
You generally can't see it because of the cyclone screen.
alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> Hit escape on startup or check your /var/adm/messages line for:
>
> SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_138 64-bit
> Copyright (c) 1983, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
> reserved.
>
oh yeah .. there it is :
Apr 30 06:50:46 aequitas genunix: [ID 540533 kern.notice] ^MSunOS Release
5.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
Any idea when it'll be on http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ ?
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
>
> On 1 May 2010, at 01:02, Brandon High wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dennis Clarke
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
>>
>> Any idea when it'll be on http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ ?
>
> Not before 2010.03 is released.
To be b
On 01.05.2010 18:06, Dennis Clarke wrote:
*snip*
> All of that is on purpose, not by accident.
Never attribute to malice what can be properly explained by
incompetence... ;)
//Svein
--
+---+---
/"\ |Svein Skogen | sv...@d80.iso100.no
What, please, does the OGB have to do with a binary distribution provided by Oracle/Sun?
(Other, than being responsible for the basis, aka the community effort, called
opensolaris.org on which that "independent" binary distribution will be based?)
So, don't blame the OGB!
Matthias
-Ursprü
On 01.05.2010 22:23, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> What, please, does the OGB have to do with a binary distribution
> provided by Oracle/Sun? (Other, than being responsible for the basis,
> aka the community effort, called opensolaris.org on which that
> "independent" binary distribution will be based
See my answer on this alias to the newly created "Opensolaris" thread... ;-)
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Svein Skogen
An: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 2.5.'10, 9:18
On 01.05.2010 22:23, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
What, please, does the OGB have to do with
On 1 May 2010, at 01:02, Brandon High wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
>
> Any idea when it'll be on http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ ?
Not before 2010.03 is released.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
C
Dennis,
Would you mind sharing how you were able to bfu to snv_138? Isn't acr part of
the closed bits, which is no longer available?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolari
Andre Lue wrote:
> Would you mind sharing how you were able to bfu to snv_138? Isn't acr part of
> the closed bits, which is no longer available?
The closed bits are still available - acr was deleted as part of the move
to IPS packaging, as noted in the flag day at:
http://static.opensolaris.
> Would you mind sharing how you were able to bfu to snv_138? Isn't
> acr part of the closed bits, which is no longer available?
I'm not Dennis, but:
Closed binaries are still available, as are bfu archives (which,
incidentally, include the closed binaries) [1].
The acr script was open, but it
> Andre Lue wrote:
> > Would you mind sharing how you were able to bfu to
> snv_138? Isn't acr part of the closed bits, which is
> no longer available?
>
> The closed bits are still available - acr was deleted
> as part of the move
> to IPS packaging, as noted in the flag day at:
>
> ttp://static
devsk wrote:
> Can I use "pkg image-update" be used to update to 138?
If/when build 138 is published to the /dev repository, yes.
For now though, pkg.opensolaris.org/dev is frozen at 134.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineeri
> If/when build 138 is published to the /dev
> repository, yes.
>
Do we have a sense of when will that happen? I am hitting a regression
introduced in 133 which causes a kernel panic as soon as I type 'ps' or 'top'
and hit enter. Its fixed in 137. Now, I can control myself and not use these
uti
On 7 May 2010, at 19:38, devsk wrote:
>> If/when build 138 is published to the /dev
>> repository, yes.
>
> Do we have a sense of when will that happen?
Based on past releases, it should happen quite soon after 2010.03 is released,
but there's no official date for that as yet (other than "firs
19 matches
Mail list logo
