Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
All traditional shells (sh,ksh,bash) expect users to know UNIX commands in
and out and not
intuitive. They are meant for UNIX savvy people. ksh93 also won't help
Solaris to gain new users who
are not exposed to UNIX before.
Grumpf... and you think this... why ?
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 8/2/06, Jignesh K. Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All traditional shells (sh,ksh,bash) expect users to know UNIX commands in
and out and not
intuitive. They are meant for UNIX savvy people. ksh93 also won't help
Solaris to gain new users who
are not exposed
All traditional shells (sh,ksh,bash) expect users to know UNIX commands in and out and not
intuitive. They are meant for UNIX savvy people. ksh93 also won't help Solaris to gain new users who
are not exposed to UNIX before. Plus they are single-threaded, need to know lot of options and not
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
As an example lets consider the ls command which can be implemted as follows
(open for discussion of course)
LIST FILES {pattern} {[IN path] {[ADDED | MODIFIED | ACCESSED] IN LAST [N]
[DAYS|MONTHS|YEARS]}}
LIST DIRECTORIES
and going beyond that
On 8/2/06, Jignesh K. Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All traditional shells (sh,ksh,bash) expect users to know UNIX commands in and
out and not
intuitive. They are meant for UNIX savvy people. ksh93 also won't help Solaris
to gain new users who
are not exposed to UNIX before. Plus they are
Rich Teer writes:
LIST DEVICES {OF TYPE REMOVABLE| HARDDISK | NETWORKADAPTERS | }
LIST USERS { LOGGEDON | INACTIVE }
LIST GROUPS
LIST FILESYSTEMS
Let me guess, you're a VMS fan? ;-)
Personally, I liked the Adventure shell from way back when:
$ look
There are two exits, called
Actually I have never used VMS in my life.
But I like SQL and I think in many ways I am thinking of standardized commands which will work on
any structure be it file , processes, directories, etc.
Similar to how /proc etc in some sense.
-Jignesh
Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006,
