Gary,
many thanks for the quick response.
Is there any defect number/link?
Thanks.
Chris
Chris,
The target build for the fix is 124.
Gary
Hello,
has this defect been fixed? Can someone provide
the
defect number/link?
I would like to update to 122, from 118. Just want
Conner,
Check out:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=412972
I don't see a bug number, but Alan is pretty confident that it will be fixed in
124.
Gary
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hello,
has this defect been fixed? Can someone provide the defect number/link?
I would like to update to 122, from 118. Just want to be sure that Raid-Z is
working...
Thanks.
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Chris,
The target build for the fix is 124.
Gary
Hello,
has this defect been fixed? Can someone provide the
defect number/link?
I would like to update to 122, from 118. Just want to
be sure that Raid-Z is working...
Thanks.
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
To be fair, this is a discovery that was only very recently verified.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Gary Gendelg...@genashor.com wrote:
To be fair, this is a discovery that was only very recently verified.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Just a heads up that a checksum error bug I discovered has been verified in
121. So, if you use or plan to use Raid-Z I wouldn't upgrade to the OSOL /dev
branch until it's been fixed (hopefully by 123).
Then again, if you don't expect to use Raid-Z, or you don't mind a grayscale
console with
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Gary Gendelg...@genashor.com wrote:
Just a heads up that a checksum error bug I discovered has been verified in
121. So, if you use or plan to use Raid-Z I wouldn't upgrade to the OSOL
/dev branch until it's been fixed (hopefully by 123).
Then again, if you
