> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > Back when _I_ was a Sun employee (circa 1998 -
> 2003) it was implicitly
> > understood that comments was _only_ to be used when
> data that could not
> > be exposed out side Sun.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not uniform, and some groups
> misinterpreted
> "be careful
Garrett> ... the b.o.o description just says "see comments", which is rather
Garrett> unhelpful for those of us outside of Sun.
Brian> It is bad enough that much important information cannot be exposed
Brian> outside of Sun, it is a real shame that many engineers who should
Brian> know better stil
Brian Utterback wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, that would be great. Unfortunately the b.o.o description just says
>> "see comments", which is rather unhelpful for those of us outside of
>> Sun.
>>
>
> It is bad enough that much important information cannot be exposed
> outside of Sun
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Yes, that would be great. Unfortunately the b.o.o description just says
"see comments", which is rather unhelpful for those of us outside of Sun.
It is bad enough that much important information cannot be exposed
outside of Sun, it is a real shame that many engineers
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Back when _I_ was a Sun employee (circa 1998 - 2003) it was implicitly
understood that comments was _only_ to be used when data that could not
be exposed out side Sun.
Unfortunately, that is not uniform, and some groups misinterpreted
"be careful not to put confidential
