[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support

2006-07-21 Thread Eric Boutilier
Thanks, Anders. You have seconds. We'll contact you offline to get you set up. Eric On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Anders Persson wrote: Several new RFCs (4293, 4022, 4113) have been published that specifies updated MIBs for IP, ICMP, TCP and UDP. I propose a project to provide support for the new MIBs.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support

2006-07-21 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 22:29 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > FYI, I believe there is work already underway to implement at least a > subset of what this project is proposing to undertake. I've Cc'ed one > of the engineers working on this to prevent duplication of effort. Rao, > can you comment on wh

[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support

2006-07-21 Thread Anders Persson
Sebastien Roy wrote: On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 15:06 -0700, Anders Persson wrote: Several new RFCs (4293, 4022, 4113) have been published that specifies updated MIBs for IP, ICMP, TCP and UDP. I propose a project to provide support for the new MIBs. Some of the issues that need to be addressed

[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support

2006-07-20 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 15:06 -0700, Anders Persson wrote: > Several new RFCs (4293, 4022, 4113) have been published that specifies > updated MIBs for IP, ICMP, TCP and UDP. I propose a project to provide > support for the new MIBs. > > Some of the issues that need to be addressed are: > - Per int

[osol-discuss] re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support

2006-07-20 Thread Peter Memishian
> Several new RFCs (4293, 4022, 4113) have been published that specifies > updated MIBs for IP, ICMP, TCP and UDP. I propose a project to provide > support for the new MIBs. > > Some of the issues that need to be addressed are: > - Per interface IP statistics for both v4 and v6 (currently