Jiri Sasek writes:
> Exactly... The problem is the gnutls is the part of the JDS even if it
> delivers more core functionality than the "window painting". What more it
> is "internal closed" interface even the "external" is more probably better
> expressing the position of this library in "o
Exactly... The problem is the gnutls is the part of the JDS even if it delivers
more core functionality than the "window painting". What more it is
"internal closed" interface even the "external" is more probably better
expressing the position of this library in "opensource world". This is
Alan
The problem is the samba does not have the --without-gnutls or something having
the same effect implemented. Opposite of that way there was a strong dependency
on gnutls on the older versions of samba (build failed when gnutls was not
switched on by "-lgnutls" option). Currently it looks go
Dermot McCluskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the GNU/UNESCO list has 5300 packages.
>
> The FSF/UNESCO directory has 5300 packages. Of these,
> only 365 are GNU packages (last time I counted).
And the FSF/UNESCO directory includes cdrtools e.g. and my ved.
Both are listed as GPLd but ve
> Well, consolidations are useful for software that has the same build
> procedures. In other words, unless there's a workload issue, I don't
> see anything wrong w/ the JDS team delivering Python, libpng, libogg,
> etc.
I think JDS would continue to deliver these pkgs, and new pkgs that
get adde
> I guess what I'm asking is: what is the rationale for
> /usr/gnu?
See:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=20197&tstart=
and the thread referenced in Laca's original post. I don't think it
makes sense to repeat those discussions here.
This message posted from opensolaris.or
> Well, the GNU/UNESCO list has 5300 packages.
The FSF/UNESCO directory has 5300 packages. Of these,
only 365 are GNU packages (last time I counted).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@o
Hi Laca,
That's terrific that it made it out of PSARC. This would make it a lot
easier to move a lot of our infrastructure off Gentoo and onto
OpenSolaris. Building a community/repository around spec files rocks
too! Anything that brings the concept of ebuilds closer to being
possible on OpenSola
