Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
>> So, you say that is not possible to create a static version of libc
>> or that source tree and makefiles need a lot of modifications to do that
>>
>>
> here is a good explanation about the static libc ( and other static
> libs in solaris) issue
> http://partneradva
On 1/22/07, Haris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >I am trying to build a static version of the C
> library by following the
> >directions in README.makefile found in /lib
> directory.
>
> There are many things in libc which require it to be
> a dynamic library.
So, you say that is not possib
>
> >
> >I am trying to build a static version of the C
> library by following the
> >directions in README.makefile found in /lib
> directory.
>
> There are many things in libc which require it to be
> a dynamic library.
So, you say that is not possible to create a static version of libc or that
