Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Community proposal: solaris-internals

2006-03-17 Thread Michelle Olson
L PROTECTED]> >To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: Community proposal: solaris-internals >X-BeenThere: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 >List-Id: General O

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Community proposal: solaris-internals

2006-03-17 Thread Susan Weber
Item 2 is within scope for the docs community. -Sue -- Sue Weber, Program Manager-Solaris Documentation Nevada, Express, Trusted and OpenSolaris (650) 786-5467 x85467 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eric Lowe wrote: > > I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with > > the proje

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Community proposal: solaris-internals

2006-03-17 Thread Eric Lowe
> I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with > the projects. That's where the conversations and collaboration are > taking place. I do agree that there should be a top-level link to docs > from the opensolaris.org home page. As one of the proposers let me add my tho

[osol-discuss] Re: Community proposal: solaris-internals

2006-03-16 Thread Susan Weber
Michelle: I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with the projects. That's where the conversations and collaboration are taking place. I do agree that there should be a top-level link to docs from the opensolaris.org home page. -Sue This message posted from openso