Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-27 Thread James C. McPherson
Lyle Merdan wrote: After talking to some people it doesn't look like the QLA2100 or QLA2200 HBA drivers would be made opensource for opensolaris. There just is not a good business case to open the source code for either family of HBAs on Solaris. Lyle, we have licensing agreements with QLogic w

[osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-26 Thread Lyle Merdan
After talking to some people it doesn't look like the QLA2100 or QLA2200 HBA drivers would be made opensource for opensolaris. There just is not a good business case to open the source code for either family of HBAs on Solaris. If someone wants an open source driver they are stuck with Linux. As

[osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-14 Thread Fazal Majid
I have a $500 Apple PCI-X HBA (with a SFP connector) in a V20z (Solaris 10 GA 3/05) using the LSI Logic 64-bit drivers for Solaris 10/x86 (the Apple card is a OEM-ed LSI7202XP). It has been running for about a month now. My home directory is on it, so I would know if there was a problem :-) We

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-10 Thread James C. McPherson
Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote: Quoting "James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... Does this mean the package which Sun distributes contains the binary solaris driver as built by QLogic, or does it mean that Sun built the driver from source under license of QLogic which now you're not allowed to

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-10 Thread Ferdinand O. Tempel
Quoting "James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > of use from a simple FC-AL setup. And I do. So just for people like me: > Don't > > simply drop support for these devices, but throw the sources out there! > > Sun doesn't have the source; we licensed the driver from QLogic... and > they've > EO

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-10 Thread Al Hopper
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, James C. McPherson wrote: > Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote: > ... > > Shame. The 2100 (I think I paid $15 for it on eBay) is a cheap entry level > > controller. I have one, and I attach it to a 3 disk "array" either directly > > or a FC hub. This is all done with an AL though, so n

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-10 Thread James C. McPherson
Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote: ... Shame. The 2100 (I think I paid $15 for it on eBay) is a cheap entry level controller. I have one, and I attach it to a 3 disk "array" either directly or a FC hub. This is all done with an AL though, so nothing "real" there. But still, there's a market for it. Peopl

[osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-10 Thread Ferdinand O. Tempel
> The 2100 doesn't support fabric it only supported > loop mode > So you really can't use 2100 with a SAN only with > older storage and point to point connections > this is the reason the support for it has > disappeared Shame. The 2100 (I think I paid $15 for it on eBay) is a cheap entry level c

[osol-discuss] Re: Fibre Channel on x86

2005-10-07 Thread Robin McDonald
The 2100 doesn't support fabric it only supported loop mode So you really can't use 2100 with a SAN only with older storage and point to point connections this is the reason the support for it has disappeared Rgds Robin This message posted from opensolaris.org _