Thanks James for taking the time to write - it clearly shows you guys are
willing to listen, which is a good thing.
I can't make it more simpler than this - OpenSolaris needs a third, independent
party here controlling and running the show - someone whom people trust to be
unbiased and not driv
> A couple other questions that Steven's post brought
> up for me:
>
> Have we done a device driver fest in the past (or do
> we have plans for
> one)?
> Do we have plans for online tutorials? (If so, on
> what topics?)
> And, on the developer education front, how can we get
> people up-to-speed
On 8/29/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't make it more simpler than this - OpenSolaris needs a third,
> independent party here controlling and running the show - someone whom people
> trust to be unbiased and not driven by commercial interests. (That excludes
> Sun and Sun appoi
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, S Destika wrote:
> I can't make it more simpler than this - OpenSolaris needs a third,
> independent party here controlling and running the show - someone whom
> people trust to be unbiased and not driven by commercial interests.
OpenSolaris DOES have an independant controlli
S Destika wrote:
Sun has made the first mistake with CDDL - they no longer can benefit from the load of GPL software
Not really - the bits newly released have gone from a proprietary
license incompatible to the GPL to the CDDL. Nothing was lost there.
And the only incompatibility is in puttin
On Monday 29 August 2005 08:40 am, S Destika wrote:
> Thanks James for taking the time to write - it clearly shows you guys are
> willing to listen, which is a good thing.
I think your messages touched a few people the wrong way, but luckily there
was a small minority that did want to and tried t
