Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Code gates

2006-03-10 Thread Danek Duvall
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:48:06PM -0800, UNIX admin wrote: > > Many are, though. At present, since we're teamware based, the > > following happens: > > Thank You for a detailed explanation; it kind of sounds like an > ungrateful yet fascinating job. It has its moments -- on both ends of the sp

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Code gates

2006-03-09 Thread UNIX admin
> Many are, though. At present, since we're teamware > based, the following > happens: Thank You for a detailed explanation; it kind of sounds like an ungrateful yet fascinating job. Depending on which SCM you will switch, making all these hooks work migh get easier. For instance, Subversion's

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Code gates

2006-03-08 Thread UNIX admin
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/too > ls/scripts/wx.sh > > http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/too > ls/scripts/wx.1 I haven't seen such nice pieces of SHELL scripting code in years (I'm surrounded by one "expert" next to the other -- don't ask.) This message

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Code gates

2006-03-08 Thread UNIX admin
> As nobody's mentioned it in this thread... 'wx' > takes care of most of > the automatic checks, and can (must) be run by ON > developers before > putting the changes from their gates back into the > main gate. It > checks for things like cstyle compliance, workspace > cleanliness, and > copy