On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:34 -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 17:45 -0700, Philip Brown
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Erast
> > Benson wrote:
>
> > multiple versions of the same package sounds like a
> > crazy idea to me. It
> > is practically not us
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 17:45 -0700, Philip Brown
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Erast
> Benson wrote:
> multiple versions of the same package sounds like a
> crazy idea to me. It
> is practically not used. But as I outlined above, it
> is possible with
> APT.
>
> Me as a
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0700, William D. Hathaway wrote:
> One thing I'd like to see in Blastwave standards is the separation of bin/lib
> from config/data. While I was a massive fan of CSW on Solaris 9, when trying
> to build S10+ machines with large numbers of zones, it seemed I li
One thing I'd like to see in Blastwave standards is the separation of bin/lib
from config/data. While I was a massive fan of CSW on Solaris 9, when trying
to build S10+ machines with large numbers of zones, it seemed I like I either
needed to make /opt/csw local on each zone, or do lots of moun
Hop over to the
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/install/";>Installation and
Packaging Community. Bart Smaalders and company are working on this.
I'm sure they would value your input.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-d
