[osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-02-01 Thread Eric Boutilier
Eric Boutilier wrote Glynn Foster wrote: Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to become the Linux distribution of choice? ... Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is. (Sound's cynical, but big-time funding gives any project a huge advantage.) Sorry. I

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-02-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Jake Maciejewski wrote: Nvidia provides Solaris drivers (do you still have to hack the PCI ID?) Not in the current release version (unless you buy a video card newer than the driver). but unless I'm missing something, ATI barely supports Linux much less Solaris (would open source drivers wor

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-02-01 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
On 2/1/06, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glynn Foster wrote: > > >Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to > >become the Linux distribution of choice? ... > > > > Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is. Money alone does not buy success, plus I doubt he invested

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-02-01 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 21:43 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote: > >Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to > >become the Linux distribution of choice? ... > > > > Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is. > > (Sound's cynical, but big-time funding gives any project a huge adv

[osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-01-31 Thread Jake Maciejewski
I agree with 1 and 3, but not really with 2 and 4. Solaris has different versions of tools to maintain backwards compatibility (particularly with BSD-based SunOS) and comply with various standards. Linux distributions care very little about backwards compatibility and try to support POSIX to th

[osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-01-31 Thread Michael Lee
Yes it would be but Ubuntu is a much better choice because of the following: 1. far more drivers, e.g.: native driver from ATI 2. single set of tools, you don't get different versions of ls, m4, awk--it's all gnu--and an extensive pkg-get software base; far better than blastwave.org 3. better lapt

[osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-01-31 Thread Eric Boutilier
Glynn Foster wrote: Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to become the Linux distribution of choice? ... Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is. (Sound's cynical, but big-time funding gives any project a huge advantage.) Eric

[osol-discuss] Re: Google OS should be OpenSolaris

2006-01-31 Thread Jake Maciejewski
I don't want to start a debate about security, but it comes at a price for any OS. Linux, Solaris, and the BSDs should all be secure enough for desktop use with nothing listening by default. Looking Glass looks neat, but I wonder if it would be usable without 3D acceleration. Nvidia provides So