De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I think,it should be cleared
(eventually with trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/kn
> This is an important issue for this project.I
> think,it should be cleared (eventually with
> trolltech) before start the project.
>
> http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
>
> http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
That helps. The last I checked, they had not made i
This is an important issue for this project.I think,it should be cleared
(eventually with trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Yes,It's probably true,LGPL is a less problem than GPL.In my perfect world
every *GPL should be banned to the normal use.In a world where everything
change in a day,we should speak about opportunities.In my opinion,an official
project for KDE (I prefer to consider kde4) on OpenSolaris (that I r
>
> On 21-Jan-07, at 6:18 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> >
> > Let's not forget its "GPL" license either which
> means that I can't
> > write CDDL software (logical since this is
> *OpenSolaris*) that uses
> > it (unless I dual license which I refuse to do).
> Gtk's LGPL license
> > is obvious
