Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Qemu (was Re: Solaris vs. Linux)

2005-07-07 Thread Dragan Cvetkovic
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote: (bash) configure should detect SDL, like this: % bash configure --target-list=i386-softmmu --prefix=/tmp/qemu Install prefix/tmp/qemu BIOS directory/tmp/qemu/share/qemu binary directory /tmp/qemu/bin Manual directory /tmp/qemu/share/man

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Qemu (was Re: Solaris vs. Linux)

2005-07-07 Thread Shawn Walker
On 7/7/05, Dragan Cvetkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I probably didn't have SDL installed on my machine so it didn't detect it. Anyway, I downloaded qemu from blastvawe testing (why does it has CSWgcc3 as one dependency?) and am now booting the latest knoppix. It is rather slow, but

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Qemu (was Re: Solaris vs. Linux)

2005-07-07 Thread Jürgen Keil
Issue 2: CPU type is not derived correctly -- hard code/`uname -p` -bash-3.00$ grep -n ^cpu configure 29:cpu=`uname -m` Under Solaris, `uname -m` returns the hardware architecture: $ uname -m sun4u I'd say that's not a problem, because two lines further down the configure script

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Qemu (was Re: Solaris vs. Linux)

2005-07-07 Thread matty91
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote: Issue 2: CPU type is not derived correctly -- hard code/`uname -p` -bash-3.00$ grep -n ^cpu configure 29:cpu=`uname -m` Under Solaris, `uname -m` returns the hardware architecture: $ uname -m sun4u I'd say that's not a problem, because two